Literature DB >> 11891456

Does anterior plating maintain cervical lordosis versus conventional fusion techniques? A retrospective analysis of patients receiving single-level fusions.

Stephan J Troyanovich1, Ann R Stroink, Keith A Kattner, Wayne A Dornan, Irina Gubina.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of medical records and radiographs of patients receiving anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) without anterior plating and with anterior plating was performed. The objective of the study was to determine whether a difference exists in cervical lordotic alignment between subjects undergoing single-level ACDF with and without anterior cervical plating instrumentation for symptomatic cervical disc disease. Collapse or settling of grafted bone into the vertebral endplates with resulting kyphotic deformity of the cervical spine is a commonly described complication of anterior discectomy and fusion. Despite the increasing use of instrumentation for the treatment of cervical spine injuries and degenerative conditions, little is known regarding lordotic alignment of the cervical spine in patients who receive plating instrumentation compared with conventional fusion without plating. Accumulating evidence suggests that plating is superior to non-plating techniques in patients with multiple level cervical disc lesions in regard to fusion, return to work rates, and complication rates; however, little is known about maintenance of lordotic curve alignment in single- and multiple-level procedures. Neutral lateral cervical radiographs of 57 patients who underwent single-level ACDF between 1994 and 1999 with anterior screw plates (n = 26), and conventional single-level fusion without anterior screw plates (n = 21) were retrospectively assessed. Measurements were made on weight-bearing lateral cervical radiographs to assess overall sagittal spinal alignment and intersegmental sagittal alignment at the surgical site before surgery, immediately after surgery, 4 to 12 weeks after surgery, and 12+ months after surgery. The average magnitude of overall lordosis measured between C2 and C7 decreased 4.2 degrees in the non-plated group, while being preserved in the plated group. This finding did not reach statistical significance in the long-term follow-up. At the surgical site, the segmental contribution to lordosis decreased an average 2.5 degrees in the non-plated group versus an increase of 5.67 degrees in the plated group, and this finding was statistically significant between groups measured at all pre- and postoperative visits (p < 0.01). On average, the plating procedure resulted in preserving overall lordosis while increasing the magnitude of segmental lordosis at the surgical site. In comparison, the conventional method resulted in a net loss of overall lordosis and segmental lordosis at the surgical site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11891456     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200202000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephen I Ryu; Jesse T Lim; Sung-Min Kim; Josemaria Paterno; Rafer Willenberg; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Huajing Chen; Peng Cao; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Wu; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Yu Liang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Scholz; K J Schnake; A Pingel; R Hoffmann; F Kandziora
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Chang Hyoun Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-03-31

6.  Anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Wen Xiao; Hua Jiang; Li-Jing Yang; Zeng-Ming Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiographic Analysis of Cervical and Spinal Alignment in Multilevel ACDF with Lordotic Interbody Device.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Alex Lemons; Eileen Lorenz; Rachel Swafford; James Osborn; Garrick Cason
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04-05

9.  Radiographic Comparison of Four Anterior Fusion Methods in Two Level Cervical Disc Diseases : Autograft Plate Fixation versus Cage Plate Fixation versus Stand-Alone Cage Fusion versus Corpectomy and Plate Fixation.

Authors:  Min-Ki Kim; Sung-Min Kim; Kwang-Mo Jeon; Tae-Sung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-03-31

10.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Bradley Moatz; P Justin Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.