Literature DB >> 11888719

Probing the paradox of patients' satisfaction with inadequate pain management.

Ree Dawson1, Judith A Spross, Erica S Jablonski, Doris R Hoyer, Deborah E Sellers, Mildred Z Solomon.   

Abstract

The paradox of patients who are in pain, yet satisfied with their pain management, has been previously reported. To probe this paradox, we used cross-sectional data collected in the primary care setting on cancer patients' patterns of pain and pain treatment, beliefs and expectations about pain and pain relief, willingness to report pain and take pain medication, care from the provider, and satisfaction with their pain management (n = 316). Descriptive findings were similar to other studies: more than 75% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their overall pain management, despite almost half of all patients reporting recent moderate to severe pain. Univariate and bivariate analyses were consistent with the hypothesis that patients may expect and are therefore satisfied with the "peak and trough" pattern of pain severity that occurs with "as-needed" administration of analgesics. However, multivariate analyses failed to directly support this hypothesis. Instead, regression analyses identified factors related to characteristics of patients' pain experiences, patients' beliefs about pain and its inevitability, the frequency that patients reported their pain, and aspects of the patient--provider relationship. Predictors of patients' satisfaction with how their primary care doctor managed their pain included: whether or not the patient was told that treating pain was an important goal, whether or not the patient reported sustained long-term pain relief, and the degree to which the patient was willing to take opioids if prescribed by the doctor or nurse (adjusted R(2) = 0.22). Qualitative data collected from patients who were in severe pain during the past three days but satisfied with their pain management (n = 88) further suggest the importance of the patient--provider relationship in shaping patient expectations. Based on these findings, we recommend that future research on outcomes in pain management place greater emphasis on the potential impact of the patient-provider relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11888719     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00399-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  26 in total

1.  Trajectories of pain and analgesics in oncology outpatients with metastatic bone pain.

Authors:  Dale J Langford; Debu Tripathy; Steven M Paul; Claudia West; Marylin J Dodd; Karen Schumacher; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Preference, expectation, and satisfaction in a clinical trial of behavioral interventions for acute and sub-acute low back pain.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Do patient-perceived pros and cons of opioids predict sustained higher-dose use?

Authors:  Stephen M Thielke; Judith A Turner; Susan M Shortreed; Kathleen Saunders; Linda Leresche; Cynthia I Campbell; Constance C Weisner; Michael V Korff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Patient-reported quality of care and pain severity in cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Claire F Snyder; Jennifer L Malin; Sydney M Dy
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-06-26

5.  Satisfaction with pain treatment in older cancer patients: Identifying variants of discrimination, trust, communication, and self-efficacy.

Authors:  Tamara A Baker; Melissa L O'Connor; Rosalyn Roker; Jessica L Krok
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.918

6.  Quality of life in cancer patients with pain in beijing.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Li-Qiu Sun; Dong Pang; Yue Ding
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Measuring the quality of dying and death in the pediatric intensive care setting: the clinician PICU-QODD.

Authors:  Deborah E Sellers; Ree Dawson; Adena Cohen-Bearak; Mildred Z Solomond; Robert D Truog
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 8.  The perioperative management of pain from intracranial surgery.

Authors:  Allan Gottschalk; Myron Yaster
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Patient Satisfaction with Pain Level in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Mary Golas; Chang Gi Park; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Procedure-related pain among adult patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Y Lidén; O Landgren; S Arnér; K-F Sjölund; E Johansson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.