Literature DB >> 23696281

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antihypertensive effect of eprosartan in Black and White hypertensive patients.

Petra C van Rijn-Bikker1, Oliver Ackaert, Nelleke Snelder, Reinier M van Hest, Bart A Ploeger, Richard P Koopmans, Ron A A Mathôt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: It is well recognized that many antihypertensive drugs exhibit large interindividual variability in effect and that this wide range of patient response to antihypertensive drugs is a major problem in achieving blood pressure (BP) control. Variability in both drug concentration and drug effect may cause the heterogeneity in antihypertensive drug response. However, for most antihypertensive drugs, no clear relationship between drug concentration and its effect on BP has been reported. This study aimed to describe the relationship between eprosartan exposure and its effect on the systolic blood pressure (SBP) using population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling. Interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was quantified and the influence of covariates on this relationship was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eprosartan plasma concentrations and SBP measurements were determined in 86 mildly hypertensive patients from the ROTATE study aged 48.1 ± 7.6 years with different ethnic backgrounds (33 White Dutch, 41 Creole Surinamese, 12 Hindustani Surinamese). In 12 of these patients, pharmacokinetics were densely sampled and 24-h ambulatory BP measurements were obtained. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling.
RESULTS: Eprosartan concentration-time profiles were adequately described with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with zero-order absorption. A log-linear relationship was used to describe the relationship between concentration and the decrease in SBP. A hypothetical effect compartment was used to describe hysteresis in the drug effect. Approximately 80 % of the maximum decrease in SBP was observed after 24 days. Interindividual variability in drug response was 65 % and decreased to 14 % when ethnicity was added as covariate. Creole Surinamese exhibited no drug response in contrast to White Dutch and Hindustani Surinamese [-2.6 mm Hg per (ng/ml)].
CONCLUSIONS: The developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model allows the quantification and explanation of variability in SBP between individuals with ethnicity as a useful determinant of responsiveness to eprosartan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696281     DOI: 10.1007/s40262-013-0073-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  25 in total

Review 1.  How can the differences among AT1-receptor antagonists be explained?

Authors:  P Morsing; G Vauquelin
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.194

2.  Management of high blood pressure in Blacks: an update of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks consensus statement.

Authors:  John M Flack; Domenic A Sica; George Bakris; Angela L Brown; Keith C Ferdinand; Richard H Grimm; W Dallas Hall; Wendell E Jones; David S Kountz; Janice P Lea; Samar Nasser; Shawna D Nesbitt; Elijah Saunders; Margaret Scisney-Matlock; Kenneth A Jamerson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Clinical relevance of optimal pharmacokinetics in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1997-12

4.  A dose proportionality study of eprosartan in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  M C Chapelsky; D E Martin; D M Tenero; B E Ilson; S C Boike; R Etheredge; D K Jorkasky
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the combination of nifedipine and doxazosin.

Authors:  R Donnelly; H L Elliott; P A Meredith; C A Howie; J L Reid
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Concentration-effect relationships and individual responses to doxazosin in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Donnelly; H L Elliott; P A Meredith; J L Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Genetic factors are relevant and independent determinants of antihypertensive drug effects in a multiracial population.

Authors:  Petra C van Rijn-Bikker; Gideon Mairuhu; Gert A van Montfrans; Eric J G Sijbrands; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Richard P Koopmans
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 8.  Sartan-AT1 receptor interactions: in vitro evidence for insurmountable antagonism and inverse agonism.

Authors:  I Van Liefde; G Vauquelin
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  Nifedipine: individual responses and concentration-effect relationships.

Authors:  R Donnelly; H L Elliott; P A Meredith; A W Kelman; J L Reid
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of eprosartan.

Authors:  D M Tenero; D E Martin; A K Miller; B Ilson; S C Boike; N Zariffa; D K Jorkasky
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiovascular Safety Assessment in Early-Phase Clinical Studies: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Exposure-Response Models.

Authors:  D J Conrado; D Chen; W S Denney
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-18

2.  Decreased potency of fimasartan in liver cirrhosis was quantified using mixed-effects analysis.

Authors:  Choon Ok Kim; Sangil Jeon; Seunghoon Han; Taegon Hong; Min Soo Park; Young-Ran Yoon; Dong-Seok Yim
Journal:  Transl Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.