Literature DB >> 1188613

Rejection and repair of endothelium in major vessel transplants.

G M Williams, A ter Haar, C Krajewski, L C Parks, J Roth.   

Abstract

Fresh saphenous vein homografts are gaining popularity as conduits for femoral-popliteal or distal bypass grafts. Aside from major blood group compatibility, there is little clinical evidence that rejection is a significant factor in long-term patency. Some have suggested that blood vessels are weakly antigenic and others indicate that rejection does not endanger long-term patency. Transplantation and toxic damage were produced in experimental animals in order to compare healing processes. Both types of injuries produced early significant endothelial cell proliferation detected by H3-thymidine uptake. This response peaked at 5 days in transplants and ever-expanding islands of proliferating endothelium were present in aortas exposed to 20 percent sodium chloride, leading to healing in 3 to 4 months. In the transplanted vessels, total endothelial destruction occurred at 11 to 28 days, and cells of host origin determined by sex chromatin analysis gradually resurfaced those grafts that maintained patency. At 4 months only two of six carotid artery homografts were patent in unmodified dogs, and eight of nine were patent in animals given 1 mg. per kilogram of Imuran. All patent grafts were resurfaced by host cells. We conclude that rejection does play a role in long-term patency; that donor endothelium of living vascular grafts cannot maintain sufficient proliferative capacity to repair immunological damage; that small doses of Imuran significantly alter the rate of destruction leading to more orderly repair and patency; and that clinical trials utilizing one half the dose of Imuran required for kidney graft survival are likely to improve significantly the long-term patency rate of fresh arterial or venous homografts in man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1188613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  8 in total

1.  Renal artery reconstruction for harvesting injuries in kidney transplantation with particular reference to the use of vascular allografts.

Authors:  A G Tzakis; V Mazzaferro; C E Pan; R D Gordon; S Todo; L Makowka; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.782

2.  Vein grafts for arterial repair: an experimental study of the histological development of the intima.

Authors:  J K McGeachie; F J Prendergast; P J Morris
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Antigenicity of venous allografts.

Authors:  S C Axthelm; J M Porter; S Strickland; G M Baur
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Modified vein allograft for small arterial reconstruction in dogs.

Authors:  Y Muto; H Eguchi; T Miyazaki; T Yukizane; K Okadome; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1986-05

5.  Biochemical (functional) adaptation of "arterialized" vein grafts.

Authors:  V J Henderson; R G Cohen; R S Mitchell; J C Kosek; D C Miller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The effect of autologous serum, Oradexon and heparin on the cell-mediated immune response in vascular diseases.

Authors:  M Horváth; E Szondy; A Ladányi
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Cadmium necrosis in transplanted testicles as evidence for persistence of original vessels in the graft.

Authors:  Z Záhor; C Povýsil
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Immunosuppressive protocols with tacrolimus after cryopreserved aortal allotransplantation in rats.

Authors:  Rudolf Spunda; Jan Hruby; Pavel Mericka; Mikulas Mlcek; Ondrej Pecha; Kathrin Splith; Moritz Schmelzle; Felix Krenzien; Jaroslav Lindner; Ivan Matia; Miroslav Spacek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.