Literature DB >> 106782

Antigenicity of venous allografts.

S C Axthelm, J M Porter, S Strickland, G M Baur.   

Abstract

With isolated exceptions, the clinical use of venous allografts has been disappointing. Considerable evidence indicates that allograft antigenicity plays a major role in the failure of venous allografts when used as arterial replacements. Recent reports suggest that DMSO-cryopreservation of venous allografts may reduce allograft antigenicity while preserving allograft viability. The present study examines the effect of modifications of vein allografts on subsequent allograft antigenicity. Skin grafts were transplanted from ACI to Lewis inbred strains of male rats. Primary skin graft rejection occurred in 9.0 +/- 1.0 days. Subcutaneous implantation of fresh inferior vena cava from ACI rate into Lewis rats resulted in subsequent skin graft rejection in 5.0 +/- 1.0 days, confirming the antigenicity of venous tissue. Cryopreservation of ACI inferior vena cava for seven days prior to implantation, with or without 15% DMSO, resulted in subsequent skin graft rejection in 5.0 +/- 1.0 days. Treatment of ACI inferior vena cava with 0.30% gluteraldehyde for 20 minutes prior to implantation in Lewis rats resulted in skin graft rejection in 9.0 +/- 1.0 days, the same time as a first set rejection. This study indicates that unmodified veins are normally antigenic and that this antigenicity is not eliminated by cryopreservation with or without DMSO. Gluteraldehyde treatment appears to reduce allograft antigenicity, but results in a nonviable graft. At the present time, there is no known way to reduce the antigenicity of viable venous allografts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 106782      PMCID: PMC1397103          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197903000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Viable vein graft preservation.

Authors:  T R Weber; T L Dent; S M Lindenauer; E Allen; L Weatherbee; H H Spencer; P Gleich
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Fresh and cryopreserved venous allografts in genetically characterized dogs.

Authors:  A D Calhoun; G M Baur; J M Porter; D H Houghton; J W Templeton
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  The venous homograft: an immunological question.

Authors:  L J Perloff; C R Reckard; D T Rowlands; C F Barker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Cryopreservation of vein grafts.

Authors:  T L Dent; T R Weber; S M Lindenauer; N Ascher; L Weatherbee; E Allen; H H Spencer
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1974

5.  The homologous saphenous vein in arterial reconstruction.

Authors:  D R Jackson; D W Abel
Journal:  Vasc Surg       Date:  1972 Mar-Apr

6.  Immunologic studies of untreated and chemically modified bovine carotid arteries.

Authors:  R J De Falco
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Coronary artery bypass with freeze-preserved saphenous vein allografts.

Authors:  D A Tice; V R Zerbino; O W Isom; J N Cunningham; R M Engelman
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Further experiences with bovine arterial grafts.

Authors:  W A Dale; M R Lewis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Preserved allografts of dilated saphenous vein for vascular access in hemodialysis: an initial experience.

Authors:  V A Piccone; H Lee; S Ramos; N Ahmed; V DiScala; M Hammanci; V A Piccone; E Nielsen; H H LeVeen; E Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Rejection and repair of endothelium in major vessel transplants.

Authors:  G M Williams; A ter Haar; C Krajewski; L C Parks; J Roth
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  6 in total

1.  Vein replacement with fresh vital veins: a comparison of transplantation in RT-1-different rat strain combinations.

Authors:  A Thiede; R Engemann; H H Korner; E Deltz; W Muller-Ruchholtz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  High compliance vascular grafts based on semi-interpenetrating networks.

Authors:  David K Dempsey; Roya M Nezarati; Calvin E Mackey; Elizabeth M Cosgriff-Hernandez
Journal:  Macromol Mater Eng       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.367

3.  Vascular grafts collagen coating resorption and healing process in humans.

Authors:  Elise Helfer; Salomé Kuntz; Delphine Dion; Frédéric Heim; Yannick Georg; Fabien Thaveau; Anne Lejay; Nabil Chakfé
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2022-03-25

4.  Preparation of venous allografts. A comparison of techniques.

Authors:  S C Balderman; M Montes; K Schwartz; T Hart; J N Bhayana; A A Gage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cryopreserved saphenous vein allografts for below-knee lower extremity revascularization.

Authors:  R S Martin; W H Edwards; J L Mulherin; W H Edwards; J M Jenkins; S J Hoff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Use of cryopreserved cadaveric arterial allograft as a vascular conduit for peripheral arterial graft infection.

Authors:  Hyojeong Kwon; Hyunwook Kwon; Joon Pio Hong; Youngjin Han; Hojong Park; Gi-Won Song; Tae-Won Kwon; Yong-Pil Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 1.859

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.