PURPOSE: To determine whether subjects with early Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) would demonstrate significant abnormalities on tests of word reading threshold (WRT), spatial contrast sensitivity (SCS), and color discrimination (CD). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 13 AD subjects, 13 subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 12 healthy elderly normal controls (ENC). CD was determined using the Farnsworth D-15 method. SCS was tested using a Vistech photographic chart. For WRT determination, pattern-masked words were presented successively at increasing target durations. The threshold was determined as the target duration at which 50% of the words were read. RESULTS: The mean number of errors in Color Discrimination and Spatial Contrast Sensitivity did not differ significantly among the three groups. WRT was significantly longer in the AD group (122.6 +/- 70.8 ms) in comparison with ENC group (53.8 +/- 15.9 ms) (p < 0.001). A WRT threshold limit of 85 msec correctly classified 11/12 ENC subjects and 10/13 AD subjects. Four of the 13 MCI subjects also exceeded this threshold and all four progressed to AD within 2 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Word Reading Threshold determination discriminates mild AD subjects from ENC, and correlates with severity of cognitive impairment. It may have diagnostic and prognostic utility in early AD and MCI subjects.
PURPOSE: To determine whether subjects with early Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) would demonstrate significant abnormalities on tests of word reading threshold (WRT), spatial contrast sensitivity (SCS), and color discrimination (CD). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 13 AD subjects, 13 subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 12 healthy elderly normal controls (ENC). CD was determined using the Farnsworth D-15 method. SCS was tested using a Vistech photographic chart. For WRT determination, pattern-masked words were presented successively at increasing target durations. The threshold was determined as the target duration at which 50% of the words were read. RESULTS: The mean number of errors in Color Discrimination and Spatial Contrast Sensitivity did not differ significantly among the three groups. WRT was significantly longer in the AD group (122.6 +/- 70.8 ms) in comparison with ENC group (53.8 +/- 15.9 ms) (p < 0.001). A WRT threshold limit of 85 msec correctly classified 11/12 ENC subjects and 10/13 AD subjects. Four of the 13 MCI subjects also exceeded this threshold and all four progressed to AD within 2 year follow-up. CONCLUSION:Word Reading Threshold determination discriminates mild AD subjects from ENC, and correlates with severity of cognitive impairment. It may have diagnostic and prognostic utility in early AD and MCI subjects.
Authors: Kallene Summer Moreira Vidal; Diego Decleva; Mirella Telles Salgueiro Barboni; Balàzs Vince Nagy; Paulo Augusto Hidalgo de Menezes; Avinash Aher; Artur Martins Coutinho; Paula Squarzoni; Daniele de Paula Faria; Fabio Luis de Souza Duran; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel; Jan Kremers; Geraldo Busatto Filho; Dora Fix Ventura Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 4.925
Authors: Elena Salobrar-Garcia; Rosa de Hoz; Blanca Rojas; Ana I Ramirez; Juan J Salazar; Raquel Yubero; Pedro Gil; Alberto Triviño; José M Ramirez Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Elena Salobrar-García; Rosa de Hoz; Ana I Ramírez; Inés López-Cuenca; Pilar Rojas; Ravi Vazirani; Carla Amarante; Raquel Yubero; Pedro Gil; María D Pinazo-Durán; Juan J Salazar; José M Ramírez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tzvi Dwolatzky; Victor Whitehead; Glen M Doniger; Ely S Simon; Avraham Schweiger; Dena Jaffe; Howard Chertkow Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2003-11-02 Impact factor: 3.921