Literature DB >> 11882636

Blood pressure variability and organ damage in a general population: results from the PAMELA study (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni).

Roberto Sega1, Giovanni Corrao, Michele Bombelli, Luca Beltrame, Rita Facchetti, Guido Grassi, Marco Ferrario, Giuseppe Mancia.   

Abstract

In hypertensive patients, 24-hour blood pressure (BP) variability (V) shows a positive relationship with organ damage, organ damage progression, and cardiovascular morbidity. The clinical relevance of BPV in the population has never been investigated. In a sample of 3200 individuals, randomly selected from the general population of Monza (Milan, Italy), we evaluated BP by an automatic oscillometric device every 20 minutes for 24 hours and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by echocardiography. In each subject, individual systolic and diastolic BP readings were averaged to obtain a 24-hour mean. Systolic BPV was obtained by calculating (1) the standard deviation of the 24-hour mean, which was taken as the overall BPV, (2) the cyclic components (Fourier spectral analysis) that in the population as a whole explained >95% of the overall BPV, and (3) the fraction of the overall BPV that in each subject was not accounted for by the 2 cyclic components, termed individual residual BPV. A similar procedure was used for diastolic BP and heart rate. Participation rate was 64.1%. Patients receiving antihypertensive therapy (n=403) were excluded from the analysis, which was therefore limited to 1648 participants. In the population as a whole, LVMI significantly related to 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP mean (beta=0.40 and beta=0.37, respectively, P<0.001 for both) but not to the 2 cyclic components that accounted for most of the BPV. On the other hand, the individual residual BPV (which accounts on average for about 50% of overall BPV) showed a significant positive relationship with LVMI (beta =0.38 and beta=0.88 for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, P<0.05 and P<0.01). No relationship was found between LVMI and heart rate values. These findings provide evidence that there is a relationship between LVMI and 24-hour average BP values in the population. They also provide the first demonstration that in the population there is also a positive independent association between LVMI and BPV. This association, however, can be exclusively seen with the BPV component that has an erratic rather than a cyclic nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882636     DOI: 10.1161/hy0202.104376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  60 in total

1.  Mimecan is involved in aortic hypertrophy induced by sinoaortic denervation in rats.

Authors:  Xiao-Song Gu; Jun-Ping Lei; Jian-Bo Shi; Wen-ling Lian; Xiang Yang; Xing Zheng; Yong-Wen Qin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Blood pressure variability: its measurement and significance in hypertension.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Andrea Faini; Mariaconsuelo Valentini
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Relation of C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha to ambulatory blood pressure variability in healthy adults.

Authors:  Jerome L Abramson; Cheryl Lewis; Nancy V Murrah; Grant T Anderson; Viola Vaccarino
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Effects of exercise and custom-made orthotics on blood pressure and heart rate variability: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  John Zhang
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2007-06

5.  Differences in ward-to-cath lab systolic blood pressure predicts long-term adverse outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Ae-Young Her; Soe Hee Ann; Jun Ho Lee; Jong Min Kim; Yong Hoon Kim; Scot Garg; Gillian Balbir Singh; Eun-Seok Shin
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Blood Pressure Variability, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in CKD Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Mallamaci; Giovanni Tripepi; Graziella D'Arrigo; Silvio Borrelli; Carlo Garofalo; Giovanna Stanzione; Michele Provenzano; Luca De Nicola; Giuseppe Conte; Roberto Minutolo; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in Early Adulthood and Myocardial Structure and Function in Later Life.

Authors:  Chike C Nwabuo; Yuichiro Yano; Henrique T Moreira; Duke Appiah; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Queen N Aghaji; Anthony Viera; Jamal S Rana; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Norrina B Allen; Pamela J Schreiner; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; João A C Lima
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Association of left ventricular structural and functional abnormalities with aortic and brachial blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients: the SAFAR study.

Authors:  C Chi; S-K Yu; R Auckle; A A Argyris; E Nasothimiou; C Tountas; E Aissopou; J Blacher; M E Safar; P P Sfikakis; Y Zhang; A D Protogerou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 9.  Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Guido Grassi; Michele Bombelli; Gino Seravalle; Gianmaria Brambilla; Raffaella Dell'oro; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 10.  Blood pressure variability, cardiovascular risk, and risk for renal disease progression.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan E Ochoa; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.