Literature DB >> 25062712

Differences in ward-to-cath lab systolic blood pressure predicts long-term adverse outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Ae-Young Her1, Soe Hee Ann2, Jun Ho Lee2, Jong Min Kim2, Yong Hoon Kim1, Scot Garg3, Gillian Balbir Singh2, Eun-Seok Shin4.   

Abstract

We sought to investigate the effect of ward-to-cath lab blood pressure (BP) differences on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). There are limited data available on the association between PCI with DES and BP differences on long-term clinical outcomes. This study enrolled 994 patients who underwent PCI with DES from March 2003 to August 2007. Resting BP was measured in a ward environment before transfer to the cardiac catheterization lab (cath lab), and again when the patient was laid down on the cath lab table. Patients were divided into two groups according to the difference in ward-to-cath lab systolic BP. Large difference group (n = 383) was defined as the absolute systolic difference of >20 mmHg and small difference group (n = 424) as the absolute systolic difference of ≤20 mmHg. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke. A total of 807 patients (mean age 60 ± 10 years, 522 males) received follow-up for 5.1 ± 2.4 years. The rate of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the large difference group compared to the small difference group (6.6 vs. 2.8 %; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.43; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-4.83; p = 0.012). There were higher cardiac deaths seen in the large difference group compared to the small difference group (3.9 vs. 1.4 %; adjusted HR 2.84; 95 % CI 1.1-7.31; p = 0.031). Stroke (2.4 vs. 1.2 %, p = 0.125) and TVR (3.7 vs. 1.7 %, p = 0.051) had higher trends in the large difference group compared to the small difference group. The composite of primary endpoints (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, nonfatal MI and stroke) occurred more frequently in the large difference group compared to the small difference group (10.0 vs. 6.4 %; adjusted HR 1.71; 95 % CI 1.04-2.81; p = 0.033). A difference in ward-to-cath lab systolic BP of >20 mmHg may contribute to increased adverse outcomes in the form of all-cause mortality and cardiac deaths in patients undergoing PCI with DES.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse outcomes; Blood pressure; Difference; Drug-eluting stent; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25062712     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-014-0550-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  25 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood pressure variability is associated with restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in normotensive patients.

Authors:  Serkan Cay; Goksel Cagirci; Ahmet Duran Demir; Yucel Balbay; Ali Riza Erbay; Sinan Aydogdu; Orhan Maden
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 5.162

2.  Intraoperative systolic blood pressure variability predicts 30-day mortality in aortocoronary bypass surgery patients.

Authors:  Solomon Aronson; Mark Stafford-Smith; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Andrew Shaw; Jeffrey Gaca; Mark Newman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Incidence and aetiology of perioperative hypertension.

Authors:  J B Leslie
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Exploring an optimum intra/postoperative management strategy for acute hypertension in the cardiac surgery patient.

Authors:  Albert T Cheung
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.620

6.  Relationship of the proinflammatory cytokines to myocardial ischemia and dysfunction after uncomplicated coronary revascularization.

Authors:  H A Hennein; H Ebba; J L Rodriguez; S H Merrick; F M Keith; M H Bronstein; J M Leung; D T Mangano; L J Greenfield; J S Rankin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Hypertension, hypertensive heart disease and perioperative cardiac risk.

Authors:  S J Howell; J W Sear; P Foëx
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, silent cerebral injury, and risk of stroke.

Authors:  Michiaki Nagai; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Relationship of steady state and ambulatory blood pressure variability to left ventricular mass and urinary albumin excretion in essential hypertension.

Authors:  D P Veerman; K de Blok; A van Montfrans
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Systemic arterial hypertension associated with cardiac surgery.

Authors:  F G Estafanous; R C Tarazi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Higher visit-to-visit intra-dialytic blood pressure is associated with the progression of aortic valve stenosis in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Naoki Norioka; Shinichi Iwata; Shiro Yanagi; Hideshi Ishii; Kenichi Sugioka; Kimio Kamimori; Takahiro Ota; Marco R Di Tullio; Shunichi Homma; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.037

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.