Literature DB >> 11877550

Demographic characteristics and normative observations for derived-trail making test indices.

Daniel L Drane1, Robert L Yuspeh, Justin S Huthwaite, Lacey K Klingler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a psychomotor task that is used routinely in clinical evaluations and consists of two parts: TMT-A and TMT-B. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relations of two derived-TMT indices with age, education, and gender and to establish normative data.
BACKGROUND: Prior research has suggested that these derived indices provide purer measures of the executive skills required to complete TMT-B. It has also been suggested that these scores can be effectively used to detect cognitive impairment, and that they are relatively free from the impact of age.
METHOD: Difference scores (B minus sign A) and ratio scores (B:A) were computed from the TMT performance of 285 adults who have no history of substance abuse or psychiatric or neurologic disorder and who are not currently being treated with any type of psychotropic medication.
RESULTS: Subjects ranged in age from 18 to 90 years and in education level from 6 to 20 years. For the entire sample, (B minus sign A) scores ranged from 6 to 248 seconds (M, 62.15; SD, 49.44), and (B:A) scores ranged from 1.23 to 9.54 (M, 2.81; SD, 1.13). Significant correlations were noted with age and (B minus sign A) and (B:A) scores, accounting for 28% and 6% of the variance, respectively. Subjects were assigned to one of eight age groups, which were formed by decade. Univariate analyses of variance were significant for (B minus sign A) (p < 0.0001) and (B:A) (p < 0.0004) scores. Post hoc analyses indicated that the two oldest age groups had significantly larger (B minus sign A) scores than the younger age groups. However, post hoc analyses with (B:A) scores indicated that only the 70-79-year-old age group significantly differed from the three youngest age groups. No other age groups significantly differed from another on this measure.
CONCLUSIONS: Normative data are presented for clinical use, and recommendations are made for future research. In addition, the current results suggest that normal aging has a significant impact on cognitive flexibility and indicate that previous suggestions for impairment cut-off scores based on the (B:A) ratio may result in erroneous classification of healthy older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11877550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol        ISSN: 0894-878X


  67 in total

1.  Differential effects of age and executive functions on the resolution of the contingent negative variation: a reexamination of the frontal aging theory.

Authors:  Georg Dirnberger; Wilfried Lang; Gerald Lindinger
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2010-03-13

2.  Effects of perceptual and contextual enrichment on visual confrontation naming in adult aging.

Authors:  Yvonne Rogalski; Jonathan E Peelle; Jamie Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Intact emotion-induced recognition bias in neuropsychological patients with executive control deficits.

Authors:  Sabine Windmann; Till Schneider; Julia Reczio; Martin Grobosch; Volker Voelzke; Valerie Blasius; Andrea Brämer; Werner Ischebeck; Grazyna Janikowski; Winfried Mandrella; Claudia Unger; Larissa Wischnjak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Antibodies to cytomegalovirus and Herpes Simplex Virus 1 associated with cognitive function in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Konasale M Prasad; Michael F Pogue-Geile; Faith Dickerson; Robert H Yolken; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The oral trail making test: effects of age and concurrent validity.

Authors:  Marty Mrazik; Scott Millis; Daniel L Drane
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.813

6.  Predictors of HVOT performance in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Christopher I Higginson; Vicki L Wheelock; Dawn Levine; Conrad T E Pappas; Karen A Sigvardt
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-07

7.  Health risk prediction models incorporating personality data: Motivation, challenges, and illustration.

Authors:  Benjamin P Chapman; Feng Lin; Shumita Roy; Ralph H B Benedict; Jeffrey M Lyness
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2019-01

8.  Ankle control differentiation as a mechanism for mobility limitations.

Authors:  Eric G James; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Suzanne G Leveille; Thomas Travison; Jonathan F Bean
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Reduced comparison speed during visual search in late life depression.

Authors:  Guy G Potter; David J Madden; Mathew C Costello; David C Steffens
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  A study of medication-taking and unobtrusive, intelligent reminding.

Authors:  Tamara L Hayes; Kofi Cobbinah; Terry Dishongh; Jeffrey A Kaye; Janna Kimel; Michael Labhard; Todd Leen; Jay Lundell; Umut Ozertem; Misha Pavel; Matthai Philipose; Kevin Rhodes; Sengul Vurgun
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.536

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.