Literature DB >> 11874918

Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede.

Cynthia L Hughes1, Thomas C Kaufman.   

Abstract

The diversity of the arthropod body plan has long been a fascinating subject of study. A flurry of recent research has analyzed Hox gene expression in various arthropod groups, with hopes of gaining insight into the mechanisms that underlie their evolution. The Hox genes have been analyzed in insects, crustaceans and chelicerates. However, the expression patterns of the Hox genes have not yet been comprehensively analyzed in a myriapod. We present the expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede, Lithobius atkinsoni, and compare our results to those from studies in other arthropods. We have three major findings. First, we find that Hox gene expression is remarkably dynamic across the arthropods. The expression patterns of the Hox genes in the centipede are in many cases intermediate between those of the chelicerates and those of the insects and crustaceans, consistent with the proposed intermediate phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda. Second, we found two 'extra' Hox genes in the centipede compared with those in Drosophila. Based on its pattern of expression, Hox3 appears to have a typical Hox-like role in the centipede, suggesting that the novel functions of the Hox3 homologs zen and bicoid were adopted somewhere in the crustacean-insect clade. In the centipede, the expression of the gene fushi tarazu suggests that it has both a Hox-like role (as in the mite), as well as a role in segmentation (as in insects). This suggests that this dramatic change in function was achieved via a multifunctional intermediate, a condition maintained in the centipede. Last, we found that Hox expression correlates with tagmatic boundaries, consistent with the theory that changes in Hox genes had a major role in evolution of the arthropod body plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874918     DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.5.1225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  27 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The ten Hox genes of the millipede Glomeris marginata.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen; Wim G M Damen
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Divergent role of the Hox gene Antennapedia in spiders is responsible for the convergent evolution of abdominal limb repression.

Authors:  Sara Khadjeh; Natascha Turetzek; Matthias Pechmann; Evelyn E Schwager; Ernst A Wimmer; Wim G M Damen; Nikola-Michael Prpic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Silencing of an abdominal Hox gene during early development is correlated with limb development in a crustacean trunk.

Authors:  Cheryl C Hsia; Adam C Paré; Michael Hannon; Matthew Ronshaugen; William McGinnis
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Unexpected UBX expression in the maxilliped of the mystacocarid crustacean Derocheilocharis remanei-evidence for a different way of making a maxilliped?

Authors:  Martin Fritsch; Stefan Richter
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Gene up-regulation in response to predator kairomones in the water flea, Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Hitoshi Miyakawa; Maki Imai; Naoki Sugimoto; Yuki Ishikawa; Asano Ishikawa; Hidehiko Ishigaki; Yasukazu Okada; Satoshi Miyazaki; Shigeyuki Koshikawa; Richard Cornette; Toru Miura
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Gene expression suggests conserved aspects of Hox gene regulation in arthropods and provides additional support for monophyletic Myriapoda.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen; Graham E Budd
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.250

8.  A comparison of Hox3 and Zen protein coding sequences in taxa that span the Hox3/zen divergence.

Authors:  Kristen Anne Panfilio; Michael Akam
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 9.  Hox genes, evo-devo, and the case of the ftz gene.

Authors:  Leslie Pick
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Variation and constraint in Hox gene evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jie Xiang; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.