Literature DB >> 28721464

Unexpected UBX expression in the maxilliped of the mystacocarid crustacean Derocheilocharis remanei-evidence for a different way of making a maxilliped?

Martin Fritsch1, Stefan Richter2.   

Abstract

In terms of morphology, crustacean maxillipeds are hybrid appendages. They arise in anterior thoracic segments and display characteristics of both locomotory (thoracic) and feeding (gnathal) appendages. Maxillipeds are functionally integrated with the anterior gnathal appendages. Hox gene expression patterns and immunolabeling with the FP6.87 antibody, which detects conserved epitopes of UBX and ABD-A proteins, reveal that maxillipeds are consistently associated with a shift in the expression of the homeotic gene Ubx. Ubx transcription products or proteins only appear in thoracic segments with a typical locomotory thoracopod and are consistently absent in the maxilliped. This pattern is found in various crustaceans: the copepod Mesocyclops, the mysid Mysidium, the decapods Homarus and Periclimenes, the isopod Porcellio, and the amphipod Parhyale. In Parhyale, which possesses maxillipeds on the first thoracic segment, gene manipulation experiments have shown that a leg-like thoracic appendage can be recovered by mis-expressing Ubx in that segment and walking legs can be transformed into maxillipeds by Ubx-knockdown. This survey focuses on the expression of UBX/ABD-A proteins, studied using the FP6.87 antibody, in the larval stages of the mystacocarid crustacean Derocheilocaris remanei. Mystacocarids inhabit the intertidal meiofauna zone of sandy beaches and possess one pair of maxillipeds on the first thoracic segment. Strong UBX/ABD-A expression in the developing maxilliped makes Derocheilocaris unique among crustaceans. Our data might also show that the transformation from locomotory thoracopod to maxilliped cannot be accounted for by the mere presence or absence of UBX, because in mystacocarids, UBX is present in both kinds of limbs. The role of the other Hox gene known to be involved in this transformation, Sex combs reduced (Scr), is unclear. The results presented here may document a new example of a shift in Hox gene function in arthropods. The difference in UBX/ABD-A expression between D. remanei and the copepod maxillipeds is of particular interest because correspondences between the feeding apparatus-including the maxilliped-in mystacocarids and copepods have been suggested as being of phylogenetic significance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entomostraca; FP6.87; Hox gene; Maxilliped; Segment and appendage specialization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28721464     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-017-0586-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  22 in total

Review 1.  Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan.

Authors:  Cynthia L Hughes; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 2.  Homeobox genes and axial patterning.

Authors:  W McGinnis; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-01-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression.

Authors:  M Averof; N H Patel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The structure and function of the homeodomain.

Authors:  M P Scott; J W Tamkun; G W Hartzell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1989-07-28

5.  Hox gene expression in the harvestman Phalangium opilio reveals divergent patterning of the chelicerate opisthosoma.

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Evelyn E Schwager; Cassandra G Extavour; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Silencing of an abdominal Hox gene during early development is correlated with limb development in a crustacean trunk.

Authors:  Cheryl C Hsia; Adam C Paré; Michael Hannon; Matthew Ronshaugen; William McGinnis
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Knockdown of Parhyale Ultrabithorax recapitulates evolutionary changes in crustacean appendage morphology.

Authors:  Danielle M Liubicich; Julia M Serano; Anastasios Pavlopoulos; Zacharias Kontarakis; Meredith E Protas; Elaine Kwan; Sandip Chatterjee; Khoa D Tran; Michalis Averof; Nipam H Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis Reveals Versatile Roles of Hox Genes in Crustacean Limb Specification and Evolution.

Authors:  Arnaud Martin; Julia M Serano; Erin Jarvis; Heather S Bruce; Jennifer Wang; Shagnik Ray; Carryn A Barker; Liam C O'Connell; Nipam H Patel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Homeotic gene expression in the locust Schistocerca: an antibody that detects conserved epitopes in Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A proteins.

Authors:  R Kelsh; R O Weinzierl; R A White; M Akam
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1994

10.  Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans.

Authors:  M Averof; M Akam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.