PURPOSE: To examine whether a mosaic pattern of retinal dysfunction in obligate carriers of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) could be observed in local electroretinographic responses obtained with the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Five obligate carriers of XLRP (mean age, 53.2 years) were recruited into the study. METHODS: Examination of each subject included a complete ocular examination, Humphrey visual field, standard full-field electroretinogram (ERG), and mfERG testing. For the mfERG, we used a 103-scaled hexagonal stimulus array that subtended a retinal area of approximately 40 in diameter. The amplitudes and implicit times in each location for the mfERG was compared with the corresponding value determined for a group of normally sighted, age-corrected control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mapping of 103 local electroretinographic response amplitudes and implicit times within the central 40 with the multifocal electroretinogram. RESULTS: Localized regions of reduced mfERG amplitudes and/or delayed implicit times were found in four of five carriers. In one of these four carriers, a mosaic pattern of mfERG dysfunction was present even in the absence of any clinically apparent retinal changes, retinal sensitivity losses on Humphrey field testing, or abnormal full-field cone ERG responses. However, one carrier with a typical tapetal-like reflex demonstrated no deficit on any functional tests. CONCLUSIONS: The mfERG demonstrated patchy areas of retinal dysfunction in some carriers of XLRP. This mosaic pattern of dysfunction may be observed in some patients with a normal-appearing fundus, normal psychophysical thresholds, and normal amplitude and implicit time full-field ERG cone responses.
PURPOSE: To examine whether a mosaic pattern of retinal dysfunction in obligate carriers of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) could be observed in local electroretinographic responses obtained with the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Five obligate carriers of XLRP (mean age, 53.2 years) were recruited into the study. METHODS: Examination of each subject included a complete ocular examination, Humphrey visual field, standard full-field electroretinogram (ERG), and mfERG testing. For the mfERG, we used a 103-scaled hexagonal stimulus array that subtended a retinal area of approximately 40 in diameter. The amplitudes and implicit times in each location for the mfERG was compared with the corresponding value determined for a group of normally sighted, age-corrected control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mapping of 103 local electroretinographic response amplitudes and implicit times within the central 40 with the multifocal electroretinogram. RESULTS: Localized regions of reduced mfERG amplitudes and/or delayed implicit times were found in four of five carriers. In one of these four carriers, a mosaic pattern of mfERG dysfunction was present even in the absence of any clinically apparent retinal changes, retinal sensitivity losses on Humphrey field testing, or abnormal full-field cone ERG responses. However, one carrier with a typical tapetal-like reflex demonstrated no deficit on any functional tests. CONCLUSIONS: The mfERG demonstrated patchy areas of retinal dysfunction in some carriers of XLRP. This mosaic pattern of dysfunction may be observed in some patients with a normal-appearing fundus, normal psychophysical thresholds, and normal amplitude and implicit time full-field ERG cone responses.
Authors: Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Steven M Jones; John L Keltner; Scot S Olivier; John S Werner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Janet P Szlyk; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Rimki Rana; Wico W Lai; Jose S Pulido; Jennifer Paliga; Norman P Blair; William Seiple Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2005 Mar-May Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Enzo Maria Vingolo; Maria Luisa Livani; D Domanico; Regina H F Mendonça; Eduardo Rispoli Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: William A Beltran; Artur V Cideciyan; Alfred S Lewin; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Jennifer H Acton; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein; Marcela Marsiglia; Mirela Tabacaru; R Theodore Smith; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 3.467