AIMS: To develop a non-competitive direct immunoassay method for quantifying nisin in solution or adsorbed to surfaces. METHODS AND RESULTS: The developed method differs from traditional ELISA in pre-forming a complex of the nisin antibodies and the secondary antibody conjugate before addition to the nisin-coated solid phase. The modifications may help decrease interference from the nisin degradation molecules and reduce non-specific adsorption of secondary antibody conjugate. The new method has a detection limit of 65 ng nisin and correlates well (r=0.982) with the agar diffusion bioassay. CONCLUSIONS: A new sensitivity method was developed to determine the amounts of nisin adsorbed to a polymeric surface. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The new technique can provide a reproducible and accurate method to quantitate nisin molecules in solutions and those bound on polymeric surfaces, and it is free of the limitations of the traditional agar diffusion bioassay.
AIMS: To develop a non-competitive direct immunoassay method for quantifying nisin in solution or adsorbed to surfaces. METHODS AND RESULTS: The developed method differs from traditional ELISA in pre-forming a complex of the nisin antibodies and the secondary antibody conjugate before addition to the nisin-coated solid phase. The modifications may help decrease interference from the nisin degradation molecules and reduce non-specific adsorption of secondary antibody conjugate. The new method has a detection limit of 65 ng nisin and correlates well (r=0.982) with the agar diffusion bioassay. CONCLUSIONS: A new sensitivity method was developed to determine the amounts of nisin adsorbed to a polymeric surface. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The new technique can provide a reproducible and accurate method to quantitate nisin molecules in solutions and those bound on polymeric surfaces, and it is free of the limitations of the traditional agar diffusion bioassay.
Authors: Raquel Criado; Jorge Gutiérrez; María Martín; Carmen Herranz; Pablo E Hernández; Luis M Cintas Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-10-20 Impact factor: 4.792