Literature DB >> 11874384

Maximizing the value of medicines by including pharmacogenetic research in drug development and surveillance.

C Brazell1, A Freeman, M Mosteller.   

Abstract

Genetics provides significant opportunities to maximize the safety and efficacy of medicines. Over the next 3--5 years, it may be possible to develop tools that use selective information from patients' DNA to enable healthcare professionals to predict more accurately those patients at risk of serious adverse events to some medicines currently available. This is likely to be followed, over the next 5--10 years, by the application of the technology to predict more accurately if individual patients will obtain a therapeutic benefit from a particular medicine. The ability to accurately predict patient response will inevitably change the way medicines are developed, evaluated, and prescribed. Advances in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) map technology are likely to drive this innovation. Abbreviated SNP profiles will provide the means to define medicine response tests, thereby allowing clinicians to select the medicine to which the patient is likely to gain the greatest benefit and least risk. This will help to maximize efficacy and reduce the incidence of drug-related adverse events. It may be possible to identify SNP profiles during larger Phase II clinical trials which predict efficacy, and use these to form the basis of Phase III entry criteria. As a result, Phase III trials may be streamlined for many medicines making them smaller, more efficient, and more focused. In addition it may be possible to incorporate pharmacogenetics into postmarketing surveillance strategies to provide a means to identify SNPs which predict uncommon serious adverse drug reactions, and so refine the initial medicine response test. The ability to develop drugs with a predictable response will allow clinicians to provide targeted treatment for patients, with greater confidence of safety and efficacy. Patients therefore will receive more efficacious, timely, and well-tolerated medicines. The challenge for those involved in drug development is to model and evaluate the application of pharmacogenetics so that steps can be taken to realize this potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11874384      PMCID: PMC1874316          DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01556.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  24 in total

Review 1.  The use of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the isolation of common disease genes.

Authors:  J H Riley; C J Allan; E Lai; A Roses
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Targets and systems of health care cost control.

Authors:  J White
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 3.  MALDI TOF mass spectrometry: an emerging platform for genomics and diagnostics.

Authors:  J Leushner
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  Preliminary draft of a Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights.

Authors: 
Journal:  Politics Life Sci       Date:  1996-09

Review 5.  The use of single-nucleotide polymorphism maps in pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  J J McCarthy; R Hilfiker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Drug-related morbidity and mortality. A cost-of-illness model.

Authors:  J A Johnson; J L Bootman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-10-09

7.  Analysis of association at single nucleotide polymorphisms in the APOE region.

Authors:  E R Martin; J R Gilbert; E H Lai; J Riley; A R Rogala; B D Slotterbeck; C A Sipe; J M Grubber; L L Warren; P M Conneally; A M Saunders; D E Schmechel; I Purvis; M A Pericak-Vance; A D Roses; J M Vance
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  J Khan; J S Wei; M Ringnér; L H Saal; M Ladanyi; F Westermann; F Berthold; M Schwab; C R Antonescu; C Peterson; P S Meltzer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine.

Authors:  A D Roses
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Desipramine pharmacokinetics in Chinese and Caucasian volunteers.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; E A Lane; W H Chang; M D Zhang; W Z Potter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine, heterogeneity of treatment effects, and the trouble with averages.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Naihua Duan; Joel Braslow
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Linking pharmacovigilance with pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  David W J Clark; Emma Donnelly; David M Coulter; Rebecca L Roberts; Martin A Kennedy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Kwame N Atuah; Dyfrig Hughes; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Genotyping of drug targets: a method to predict adverse drug reactions?

Authors:  Cüneyt Güzey; Olav Spigset
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.228

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.