Literature DB >> 11871045

Living donors' perception of their quality of health after donation.

W de Graaf Olson1, A Bogetti-Dumlao.   

Abstract

To alleviate the long wait on the cadaveric transplant list, recipients are pursuing the option of living donation. Potential donors may have significant concerns about the decision to donate, including the quality of health after donation. This study identifies living donors' perception regarding their quality of health after donating a kidney, and identifies the perception of the adequacy of the medical follow-up after donation. In this retrospective study, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey was mailed to all kidney donors at the transplant center from January 1995 to December 1998 (n = 118). The study population scored significantly better than the US sample population in all 8 categories of the questionnaire. When comparing scores using the relationship of the donor to the recipient, mean scores of donors who were "distant relatives" were found to be lower in 7 of the 8 categories. Most donors who had follow-up after donation felt it to be excellent to good; yet 50% stated they had no healthcare follow-up after donation. Themes were identified regarding the type of follow-up donors felt they needed after donation. Donors perceived their quality of health after donation as better than the general US population. Donor follow-up needs to be emphasized and followed more systematically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11871045     DOI: 10.1177/152692480101100206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.065


  3 in total

1.  Emotional and Financial Experiences of Kidney Donors over the Past 50 Years: The RELIVE Study.

Authors:  Cheryl L Jacobs; Cynthia R Gross; Emily E Messersmith; Barry A Hong; Brenda W Gillespie; Peg Hill-Callahan; Sandra J Taler; Sheila G Jowsey; Tim J Beebe; Arthur J Matas; Jonah Odim; Hassan N Ibrahim
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

3.  Your Path to Transplant: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored computer education intervention to increase living donor kidney transplant.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; Mark L Robbins; Andrea L Paiva; John D Peipert; Crystal S Kynard-Amerson; Christina J Goalby; LaShara A Davis; Jessica L Thein; Emily A Schenk; Kari A Baldwin; Stacy L Skelton; Nicole R Amoyal; Leslie A Brick
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.