Literature DB >> 11870950

Incomplete retention after direct myocardial injection.

P Michael Grossman1, Zhenguo Han, Maria Palasis, James J Barry, Robert J Lederman.   

Abstract

Direct intramyocardial injection may permit local delivery of protein and gene therapy agents for myocardial and coronary artery disease. Little is known about the immediate fate of materials administered via percutaneous endomyocardial catheters or via surgical epicardial injection. In this study, we use a novel method to evaluate the acute retention of agents injected directly into the myocardium, compare epicardial with the percutaneous endocardial and postmortem delivery, and evaluate the influence of injectate volume on myocardial retention. Fifteen 40-50 kg pigs underwent overlapping myocardial injections using a percutaneous endomyocardial catheter, an epicardial needle via an open chest, and epicardial needle postmortem. Multiple distinct 15 micro neutron-activated microsphere species were used as tracers. Two or three myocardial walls were injected in each animal using 3.5 mm, 27-28 gauge needles at varying injectate volumes. Animals were sacrificed immediately. Myocardial walls were divided and multiple microsphere species were quantified. In an additional study, nine 70 kg pigs underwent percutaneous endomyocardial injections with replication-deficient adenovirus encoding for the production of lac-Z. The injectate volume was varied, while the viral particle number remained constant. The animals were sacrificed 5 days after the percutaneous injections; the heart, liver, and spleen were collected for beta-galactosidase activity. Endomyocardial injection was associated with 43% +/- 15% microsphere retention, compared with 15% +/- 21% (P < 0.01) retention of open chest epicardial injection and 89% +/- 60% (P < 0.01) for postmortem injection. Reducing the injectate volume from 100 to 10 microL improved microsphere retention (P = 0.01). There was a trend toward improved viral transfection associated with smaller injection volumes. Despite direct intramyocardial administration, a significant fraction of injectate is not retained locally. Catheter-based needle endomyocardial injection is associated with equivalent or superior injectate retention compared with open chest epicardial injection. Proportionately, more injectate may be retained at lower volumes. Loss may involve a combination of channel leakage, venous, and lymphatic return. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11870950     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  52 in total

1.  Undersampled projection reconstruction for active catheter imaging with adaptable temporal resolution and catheter-only views.

Authors:  Dana C Peters; Robert J Lederman; Alexander J Dick; Venkatesh K Raman; Michael A Guttman; J Andrew Derbyshire; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Cardiac stem cell therapy and arrhythmogenicity: prometheus and the arrows of Apollo and Artemis.

Authors:  Alexander R Lyon; Sian E Harding; Nicholas S Peters
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Delivery of gene and cellular therapies for heart disease.

Authors:  Justin A Mariani; David M Kaye
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Intramyocardial navigation and mapping for stem cell delivery.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Delivery and tracking of therapeutic cell preparations for clinical cardiovascular applications.

Authors:  R de Silva; R J Lederman
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 6.  Percutaneous approaches for efficient cardiac gene delivery.

Authors:  Kiyotake Ishikawa; Jaume Aguero; Charbel Naim; Kenneth Fish; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Cardiac gene therapy: optimization of gene delivery techniques in vivo.

Authors:  Michael G Katz; JaBaris D Swain; Jennifer D White; David Low; Hansell Stedman; Charles R Bridges
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 8.  Targeted gene therapy for the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Kleopatra Rapti; Antoine H Chaanine; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Cellular bioenergetics is an important determinant of the molecular imaging signal derived from luciferase and the sodium-iodide symporter.

Authors:  Connie Chang; Angel Chan; Xiaoping Lin; Takahiro Higuchi; John Terrovitis; Junaid M Afzal; Andrew Rittenbach; Dongdong Sun; Styliani Vakrou; Kirubel Woldemichael; Brian O'Rourke; Richard Wahl; Martin Pomper; Benjamin Tsui; M Roselle Abraham
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Magnetic resonance fluoroscopy allows targeted delivery of mesenchymal stem cells to infarct borders in Swine.

Authors:  Alexander J Dick; Michael A Guttman; Venkatesh K Raman; Dana C Peters; Breno S S Pessanha; Jonathan M Hill; Scott Smith; Greig Scott; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.