PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose and the clinical efficacy of epirubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients were treated at three different epirubicin dose levels: 140 mg/m(2) (six patients), 160 mg/m(2) (52 patients), and 180 mg/m(2) (three patients). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. The first two dose levels proved to be feasible and safe without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Because the first three patients entering the third dose level experienced DLT, subsequent patients received the next lower dose level. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 44% (95% confidence interval, +/- 12%), with six complete (10%) and 21 partial (34%) responses. Responses seemed related to epirubicin dose level, because the response rate was 17%, 44%, and 100% for the three dose levels (chi(2) test for trend, P =.02). Median response duration, median time to progression, and median overall survival were 10, 8, and 15 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent side effect, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 79% of the patients; 31% of patients were febrile. Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly grades 1 and 2. The mean epirubicin dose-intensity was 49 mg/m(2) per week. CONCLUSION: The third epirubicin dose level (180 mg/m(2)) was the maximum-tolerated dose. The recommended drug dose for clinical use is 160 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks with hematopoietic support. Single high-dose epirubicin is effective as first-line treatment and should be preferentially used whenever a high response rate is important to allow the resection of an otherwise unresectable disease or whenever it might result in a significant symptomatic benefit.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose and the clinical efficacy of epirubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients were treated at three different epirubicin dose levels: 140 mg/m(2) (six patients), 160 mg/m(2) (52 patients), and 180 mg/m(2) (three patients). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. The first two dose levels proved to be feasible and safe without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Because the first three patients entering the third dose level experienced DLT, subsequent patients received the next lower dose level. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 44% (95% confidence interval, +/- 12%), with six complete (10%) and 21 partial (34%) responses. Responses seemed related to epirubicin dose level, because the response rate was 17%, 44%, and 100% for the three dose levels (chi(2) test for trend, P =.02). Median response duration, median time to progression, and median overall survival were 10, 8, and 15 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent side effect, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 79% of the patients; 31% of patients were febrile. Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly grades 1 and 2. The mean epirubicin dose-intensity was 49 mg/m(2) per week. CONCLUSION: The third epirubicin dose level (180 mg/m(2)) was the maximum-tolerated dose. The recommended drug dose for clinical use is 160 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks with hematopoietic support. Single high-dose epirubicin is effective as first-line treatment and should be preferentially used whenever a high response rate is important to allow the resection of an otherwise unresectable disease or whenever it might result in a significant symptomatic benefit.
Authors: David E Joyner; Mark L Wade; Aniko Szabo; Jeffrey Bastar; Cheryl M Coffin; Karen H Albritton; Philip S Bernard; R Lor Randall Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-22 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Peter Reichardt; Karin Oechsle; Daniel Pink; Carsten Bokemeyer; F Schneller; Rolf Issels; Lothar Kanz; Jörg Thomas Hartmann Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: J T Hartmann; K Oechsle; J Huober; A Jakob; M Azemar; M Horger; L Kanz; C Bokemeyer Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Giovanni Palleschi; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Salvatore Evangelista; Luigi Silvestri; Luigi Rossi; Claudio Di Cristofano; Natale Porta; Vincenzo Petrozza; Silverio Tomao; Antonio Carbone Journal: J Med Case Rep Date: 2014-06-25
Authors: Aaron D Schenone; Jingqin Luo; Luke Montgomery; Daniel Morgensztern; Douglas R Adkins; Brian A Van Tine Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 4.452