J T Hartmann1, K Oechsle, J Huober, A Jakob, M Azemar, M Horger, L Kanz, C Bokemeyer. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, South West German Cancer Center, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany. joerg.hartmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of effective cytotoxic agents for the treatment of patients with metastatic adult type soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is limited, when patients have failed anthracyline-based chemotherapy. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine in this setting. METHODS: Between August 2001 and March 2003 19 patients were eligible to enter. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minutes infusion at a dosage of 1 g/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. All patients had progressive disease during (n = 12) or shortly after an anthracycline-based regimen (n = 3). RESULTS: Four of 19 patients did not start study treatment because of fulminant progression. Fifteen patients with a median age 47 years (32-72) were assessable. All patients had received at least one prior treatment regimen (range, 1-6) for metastatic disease containing anthracyclines (n = 15) and ifosfamide (n = 11). To date, a total of 72+ cycles have been applied (median; 3, 1-28+). Seven patients (47%) had progressive disease after completion of two cycles at the first response assessment. One patient (6%) attained a partial remission, and 7 patients (47%) achieved disease stabilisations. One patient is still on treatment after more than 2.5 years. The calculated progression-free rate at 3 and 6 months was 46.7% (CI(95%), 21.4-71.9) and 13.3% (CI(95%), (0-30.5). 95% of the cycles have been applied without any dose modification or treatment delay. CONCLUSIONS: Considering response and progression-free rate as the primary endpoints for phase II trials in pretreated STS, gemcitabine has moderate efficacy.
BACKGROUND: The number of effective cytotoxic agents for the treatment of patients with metastatic adult type soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is limited, when patients have failed anthracyline-based chemotherapy. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine in this setting. METHODS: Between August 2001 and March 2003 19 patients were eligible to enter. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minutes infusion at a dosage of 1 g/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. All patients had progressive disease during (n = 12) or shortly after an anthracycline-based regimen (n = 3). RESULTS: Four of 19 patients did not start study treatment because of fulminant progression. Fifteen patients with a median age 47 years (32-72) were assessable. All patients had received at least one prior treatment regimen (range, 1-6) for metastatic disease containing anthracyclines (n = 15) and ifosfamide (n = 11). To date, a total of 72+ cycles have been applied (median; 3, 1-28+). Seven patients (47%) had progressive disease after completion of two cycles at the first response assessment. One patient (6%) attained a partial remission, and 7 patients (47%) achieved disease stabilisations. One patient is still on treatment after more than 2.5 years. The calculated progression-free rate at 3 and 6 months was 46.7% (CI(95%), 21.4-71.9) and 13.3% (CI(95%), (0-30.5). 95% of the cycles have been applied without any dose modification or treatment delay. CONCLUSIONS: Considering response and progression-free rate as the primary endpoints for phase II trials in pretreated STS, gemcitabine has moderate efficacy.
Authors: S Delaloge; A Yovine; A Taamma; M Riofrio; E Brain; E Raymond; P Cottu; F Goldwasser; J Jimeno; J L Misset; M Marty; E Cvitkovic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kirsten M Leu; Leo J Ostruszka; Donna Shewach; Mark Zalupski; Vernon Sondak; J Sybil Biermann; Julia Shin-Jung Lee; Carol Couwlier; Krisinda Palazzolo; Laurence H Baker Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E C Borden; D A Amato; C Rosenbaum; H T Enterline; M J Shiraki; R H Creech; H J Lerner; P P Carbone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Scott Okuno; John Edmonson; Michelle Mahoney; Jan C Buckner; Stephen Frytak; Evanthia Galanis Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Gary Von Burton; Cathy Rankin; Mark M Zalupski; Glen M Mills; Ernest C Borden; Antman Karen Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Robert M Jotte; Daniel D Von Hoff; Fadi Braiteh; Carlos R Becerra; Donald A Richards; David A Smith; Lawrence Garbo; Joe Stephenson; Paul R Conkling; Francisco Robert-Vizcarrondo; Jian Chen; P Kellie Turner; Kay Hoong Chow; D Fritz Tai; Robert Ilaria Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Juan Martin-Liberal; Antonio López-Pousa; Javier Martínez-Trufero; Javier Martín-Broto; Ricardo Cubedo; Javier Lavernia; Andrés Redondo; José Antonio López-Martín; Nùria Mulet-Margalef; Xavier Sanjuan; Òscar M Tirado; Xavier Garcia-Del-Muro Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Jörg Thomas Hartmann; R D Issels; K San Nicolo; V Grünwald; B Hertenstein; E Papesch; S Krause; I Sturm Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-07-12 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Thomas Schmitt; Eva Keller; Sascha Dietrich; Patrick Wuchter; Anthony D Ho; Gerlinde Egerer Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 5.118
Authors: Marcus Lehnhardt; Adrien Daigeler; Heinz H Homann; Vanessa Schwaiberger; Ole Goertz; Cornelius Kuhnen; Hans U Steinau Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: M Lehnhardt; A Daigeler; H H Homann; J Hauser; S Langer; L Steinsträsser; C Soimaru; A Puls; H U Steinau Journal: Chirurg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 0.955