PURPOSE: To compare two methods of radio-frequency (RF) ablation, saline enhancement technique and internally cooled electrodes, for the treatment of small breast cancers in an animal model--highly aggressive VX2 rabbit tumors surrounded by adipose tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven tumors were implanted into retroperitoneal fat of 14 New Zealand White rabbits. RF ablation was performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance after tumors had grown to 15 mm. Fourteen tumors in seven animals were treated with internally cooled electrodes (30-mm-tip single electrode, 60 W, 10 min); 13 tumors in seven animals, with saline enhancement (0.5 mL/min of saline, 25-mm tip, 30 W, 10 min). Autopsy and histopathologic assessment were performed 3 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Real-time US of RF ablation was not possible with either method because of obscuration by the increasing hyperechogenicity of the tumor and the surrounding adipose tissue. Equivalent efficacy was demonstrated with the two methods. Significantly greater complications were observed with the saline technique: Free retroperitoneal fluid was detected in one of seven animals with internally cooled electrodes and in all seven animals with saline enhancement (P <.01). Damage to remote structures such as the kidney, spine muscle, and skin was observed at autopsy in one of seven animals with internally cooled technique versus five of seven with saline enhancement (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Given a lower complication rate and similar treatment efficacy in an animal tumor model, internally cooled RF electrode may be advantageous to adjuvant saline infusion for the minimally invasive treatment of breast tumors.
PURPOSE: To compare two methods of radio-frequency (RF) ablation, saline enhancement technique and internally cooled electrodes, for the treatment of small breast cancers in an animal model--highly aggressive VX2 rabbit tumors surrounded by adipose tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven tumors were implanted into retroperitoneal fat of 14 New Zealand White rabbits. RF ablation was performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance after tumors had grown to 15 mm. Fourteen tumors in seven animals were treated with internally cooled electrodes (30-mm-tip single electrode, 60 W, 10 min); 13 tumors in seven animals, with saline enhancement (0.5 mL/min of saline, 25-mm tip, 30 W, 10 min). Autopsy and histopathologic assessment were performed 3 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Real-time US of RF ablation was not possible with either method because of obscuration by the increasing hyperechogenicity of the tumor and the surrounding adipose tissue. Equivalent efficacy was demonstrated with the two methods. Significantly greater complications were observed with the saline technique: Free retroperitoneal fluid was detected in one of seven animals with internally cooled electrodes and in all seven animals with saline enhancement (P <.01). Damage to remote structures such as the kidney, spine muscle, and skin was observed at autopsy in one of seven animals with internally cooled technique versus five of seven with saline enhancement (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Given a lower complication rate and similar treatment efficacy in an animal tumor model, internally cooled RF electrode may be advantageous to adjuvant saline infusion for the minimally invasive treatment of breast tumors.
Authors: Eleni Liapi; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Mustafa Vali; Afsheen A Khwaja; Veronica Prieto-Ventura; Manon Buijs; Josephina A Vossen; Shanmugasudaram Ganapathy-Kanniappan; Shanmugasudaram Ganapathy; Richard L Wahl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jeong Min Lee; Ji Hyun Youk; Young Kon Kim; Young Min Han; Gyung Ho Chung; Sang Yong Lee; Chong Soo Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-04-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Young Lee; Hee Sun Park; Hong Eo; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-04-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jeong Min Lee; Young Kon Kim; Young Hwan Lee; Sang Won Kim; Chun Ai Li; Chong Soo Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2003 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Leah Hennings; Yihong Kaufmann; Robert Griffin; Eric Siegel; Petr Novak; Peter Corry; Eduardo G Moros; Gal Shafirstein Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Fernando Burdío; Ana Navarro; Ramón Sousa; José M Burdío; Antonio Güemes; Ana Gonzalez; Ignacio Cruz; Tomás Castiella; Ricardo Lozano; Enrique Berjano; Joan Figueras; Miguel A de Gregorio Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Gal Shafirstein; Yihong Kaufmann; Leah Hennings; Eric Siegel; Robert J Griffin; Petr Novák; Scott Ferguson; Eduardo G Moros Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Jeong Min Lee; Sang Won Kim; Chun Ai Li; Ji Hyun Youk; Young Kon Kim; Zhewu Jin; Myoung Ja Chung; Mi Suk Lee Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2002 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 3.500