PURPOSE: A proof-of-concept study to evaluate a new autofluorescence method to differentiate necrotic thermally fixed cells from viable tissue following thermal ablation. METHODS: A conductive interstitial thermal therapy (CITT) device was used to ablate swine mammary tissue and rabbit VX-2 carcinomas in vivo. The ablated regions and 10-mm margins were resected 24 h following treatment, embedded in HistOmer and sectioned at 3 mm. The fresh sections were evaluated for gross viability with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride, 1 h post-resection. Representative non-viable and viable areas were then processed and embedded into paraffin, and sectioned at 5 microm. Standard H&E staining and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemistry were compared against autofluorescence intensity, at 488-nm wavelength, for cellular viability. RESULTS: Heat-fixed cells in non-viable regions exhibit increased autofluorescence intensity compared to viable tissue (area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve = 0.96; Mann-Whitney P < 0.0001). An autofluorescence intensity-based classification rule achieved 92% sensitivity with 100% specificity for distinguishing non-viable from viable samples. In contrast, PCNA staining did not reliably distinguish heat-fixed, dead cells from viable cells. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of H&E-stained sections using autofluorescence intensity-based classification is a reliable and readily available method to accurately identify heat-fixed cells in ablated surgical margins.
PURPOSE: A proof-of-concept study to evaluate a new autofluorescence method to differentiate necrotic thermally fixed cells from viable tissue following thermal ablation. METHODS: A conductive interstitial thermal therapy (CITT) device was used to ablate swine mammary tissue and rabbit VX-2 carcinomas in vivo. The ablated regions and 10-mm margins were resected 24 h following treatment, embedded in HistOmer and sectioned at 3 mm. The fresh sections were evaluated for gross viability with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride, 1 h post-resection. Representative non-viable and viable areas were then processed and embedded into paraffin, and sectioned at 5 microm. Standard H&E staining and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemistry were compared against autofluorescence intensity, at 488-nm wavelength, for cellular viability. RESULTS: Heat-fixed cells in non-viable regions exhibit increased autofluorescence intensity compared to viable tissue (area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve = 0.96; Mann-Whitney P < 0.0001). An autofluorescence intensity-based classification rule achieved 92% sensitivity with 100% specificity for distinguishing non-viable from viable samples. In contrast, PCNA staining did not reliably distinguish heat-fixed, dead cells from viable cells. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of H&E-stained sections using autofluorescence intensity-based classification is a reliable and readily available method to accurately identify heat-fixed cells in ablated surgical margins.
Authors: S M Wildhirt; H Suzuki; D Horstman; S Weismüller; R R Dudek; K Akiyama; B Reichart Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-09-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D S Robinson; J M Parel; D B Denham; X González-Cirre; F Manns; P J Milne; R D Schachner; A J Herron; J Comander; G Hauptmann Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Wieslawa H Dragowska; Corinna Warburton; Donald T T Yapp; Andrew I Minchinton; Yanping Hu; Dawn N Waterhouse; Karen Gelmon; Kirsten Skov; Janet Woo; Dana Masin; Lynsey A Huxham; Alastair H Kyle; Marcel B Bally Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: C Germer; C M Isbert; D Albrecht; J P Ritz; A Schilling; A Roggan; K J Wolf; G Müller; H Buhr Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: D S Robinson; J M Parel; D B Denham; F Manns; X Gonzalez; R Schachner; A Herron; E C Burdette Journal: Am Surg Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Yang Li; Xun Chen; Beckham Watkins; Neal Saini; Steven Gannon; Elizabeth Nadeau; Russell Reeves; Bruce Gao; Vincent Pelligrini; Hai Yao; Jeremy Mercuri; Tong Ye Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2020-01-07
Authors: Klressa D Barnes; Gal Shafirstein; Jessica S Webber; Nathan A Koonce; Zachary Harris; Robert J Griffin Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Lauren E Marshall; Kayla F Goliwas; Lindsay M Miller; Andrew D Penman; Andra R Frost; Joel L Berry Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Nikol Snoeren; Joost Huiskens; Arjen M Rijken; Richard van Hillegersberg; Arian R van Erkel; Gerrit D Slooter; Joost M Klaase; Petrousjka M van den Tol; Fibo J W Ten Kate; Maarten C Jansen; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 5.344