PURPOSE: According to recent literature, the presence and the amount of true compensatory ocular counterroll is still debatable. The purpose of the current study was to assess compensatory counterroll in response to lateral head tilt using a new noninvasive recording technique, and, furthermore, to find out whether the amount of counterroll is influenced by the presence or absence of spatial orientation. METHODS: Eye movement recordings were performed using the infrared three-dimensional video oculography (3D-VOG) technique. Objective cycloposition of five healthy individuals was measured in presumed primary position and in head tilt positions of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 45 degrees to the right and left. The same paradigm was performed under three viewing conditions: binocularly without spatial orientation and both binocularly and monocularly with spatial orientation. RESULTS: A consistent ocular counterroll corresponding to the amount of head tilt was observed in all subjects. Maximum torsional amplitude was 10 degrees at a 45-degree head tilt. The relative amount of compensation ranged between 13% and 22% of the actual head tilt, decreasing with increasing head tilt. Compensatory counterroll and torsional conjugacy between both eyes revealed minor differences between the experimental paradigms. Incomplete cycloductional reorientation in primary position after head tilt was detected in all subjects, regardless of the stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: A consistent compensatory ocular counterroll was demonstrated in response to static lateral tilting of the head in healthy individuals. The amplitude of counterroll and the gain of compensatory cycloversion were higher than has been generally reported. Infrared 3D-VOG technique was a reliable and comfortable method for the assessment of ocular cycloduction. It can be considered to be a promising tool for advanced evaluation of disturbances of the oblique eye muscles.
PURPOSE: According to recent literature, the presence and the amount of true compensatory ocular counterroll is still debatable. The purpose of the current study was to assess compensatory counterroll in response to lateral head tilt using a new noninvasive recording technique, and, furthermore, to find out whether the amount of counterroll is influenced by the presence or absence of spatial orientation. METHODS: Eye movement recordings were performed using the infrared three-dimensional video oculography (3D-VOG) technique. Objective cycloposition of five healthy individuals was measured in presumed primary position and in head tilt positions of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 45 degrees to the right and left. The same paradigm was performed under three viewing conditions: binocularly without spatial orientation and both binocularly and monocularly with spatial orientation. RESULTS: A consistent ocular counterroll corresponding to the amount of head tilt was observed in all subjects. Maximum torsional amplitude was 10 degrees at a 45-degree head tilt. The relative amount of compensation ranged between 13% and 22% of the actual head tilt, decreasing with increasing head tilt. Compensatory counterroll and torsional conjugacy between both eyes revealed minor differences between the experimental paradigms. Incomplete cycloductional reorientation in primary position after head tilt was detected in all subjects, regardless of the stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: A consistent compensatory ocular counterroll was demonstrated in response to static lateral tilting of the head in healthy individuals. The amplitude of counterroll and the gain of compensatory cycloversion were higher than has been generally reported. Infrared 3D-VOG technique was a reliable and comfortable method for the assessment of ocular cycloduction. It can be considered to be a promising tool for advanced evaluation of disturbances of the oblique eye muscles.
Authors: Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-04
Authors: Jorge Otero-Millan; Carolina Treviño; Ariel Winnick; David S Zee; John P Carey; Amir Kheradmand Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Joanne C Y Leung; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Khaled Abuhaleeqa; Agnes M F Wong Journal: Vision Res Date: 2009-05-03 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Vera C Zingler; Eva Weintz; Klaus Jahn; Kai Bötzel; Judith Wagner; Doreen Huppert; Andrea Mike; Thomas Brandt; Michael Strupp Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 4.849