Literature DB >> 11864930

Perfusion versus function: the ischemic cascade in demand ischemia: implications of single-vessel versus multivessel stenosis.

Howard Leong-Poi1, Se-Joong Rim, D Elizabeth Le, Nick G Fisher, Kevin Wei, Sanjiv Kaul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that during demand ischemia, abnormal perfusion will precede abnormal function, the spatial extent of perfusion abnormality will be greater than that of functional abnormality, and the spatiotemporal disparity between abnormal perfusion and abnormal function will be more marked in the presence of single-vessel stenosis (SVS) versus multivessel stenosis (MVS). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Nine dogs each underwent either SVS or MVS placement. These noncritical stenoses were classified as mild, moderate, or severe on the basis of the transstenotic pressure gradient (10 to 14, 15 to 20, or >20 mm Hg). Dobutamine was infused starting at 10 and reaching 40 microg/kg(-1) x min(-1). Wall thickening (WT) and myocardial perfusion (myocardial contrast echocardiography) were assessed at each stage. Resting perfusion and function were normal in all dogs. In SVS, abnormal perfusion (delayed rate of microbubble replenishment) was seen at the lowest dose of dobutamine irrespective of the stenosis severity, whereas WT abnormality was seen only at high doses of dobutamine and was influenced by the stenosis severity. The spatial extent of abnormal perfusion exceeded that of WT abnormality at all but the highest dobutamine dose. This spatiotemporal discordance between abnormal perfusion and function was significantly less in MVS, where it was possible to identify separate regions with abnormal function at lower doses of dobutamine.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the occurrence of the ischemic cascade during demand ischemia. They also explain the higher sensitivity of abnormal perfusion compared with abnormal function for the detection of coronary stenosis as well as the higher sensitivity of dobutamine echocardiography for MVS compared with SVS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11864930     DOI: 10.1161/hc0802.104326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

1.  Stress myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  M J Monaghan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Value of additional myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of intermediate coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Rolf Gebker; M Frick; C Jahnke; A Berger; C Schneeweis; R Manka; S Kelle; C Klein; B Schnackenburg; E Fleck; I Paetsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Echocardiographic insights into regional flow-function relationships in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: methodology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond Y Kwong; Gregg W Stone; Roxy Senior; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Jennifer H Mieres; Thomas H Marwick; Lawrence M Phillips; Farooq A Chaudhry; Patricia A Pellikka; Piotr Slomka; Andrew E Arai; Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; Todd D Miller; Eike Nagel; Abhinav Goyal; Salvador Borges-Neto; William E Boden; Harmony R Reynolds; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06

7.  Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Sung Min Ko; Jin Woo Choi; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Hyun Woo Chung; Dong Hun Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Authors:  Todd D Miller; John Wells Askew; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Comparison of quantitative wall-motion analysis and strain for detection of coronary stenosis with three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Katherine M Parker; Alexander P Clark; Norman C Goodman; David K Glover; Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion echocardiography and coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Barletta; Maria Riccarda Del Bene
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.