Literature DB >> 11864569

An unexpected role for visual feedback in vehicle steering control.

Guy Wallis1, Astros Chatziastros, Heinrich Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Some motor tasks can be completed, quite literally, with our eyes shut. Most people can touch their nose without looking or reach for an object after only a brief glance at its location. This distinction leads to one of the defining questions of movement control: is information gleaned prior to starting the movement sufficient to complete the task (open loop), or is feedback about the progress of the movement required (closed loop)? One task that has commanded considerable interest in the literature over the years is that of steering a vehicle, in particular lane-correction and lane-changing tasks. Recent work has suggested that this type of task can proceed in a fundamentally open loop manner, with feedback mainly serving to correct minor, accumulating errors. This paper reevaluates the conclusions of these studies by conducting a new set of experiments in a driving simulator. We demonstrate that, in fact, drivers rely on regular visual feedback, even during the well-practiced steering task of lane changing. Without feedback, drivers fail to initiate the return phase of the maneuver, resulting in systematic errors in final heading. The results provide new insight into the control of vehicle heading, suggesting that drivers employ a simple policy of "turn and see," with only limited understanding of the relationship between steering angle and vehicle heading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11864569     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00685-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Andrew C Beall; Jonathan W Kelly; Roy S Smith; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Limitations of feedforward control in multiple-phase steering movements.

Authors:  Steven R Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visuomotor control of steering: the artefact of the matter.

Authors:  Steven Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Predictors of lane-change errors in older drivers.

Authors:  Cynthia A Munro; Joan Jefferys; Emily W Gower; Beatriz E Muñoz; Constantine G Lyketsos; Lisa Keay; Kathleen A Turano; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Sheila K West
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  When flow is not enough: evidence from a lane changing task.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-07

8.  Initiation of evasive manoeuvres during self-motion: a test of three hypotheses.

Authors:  James R Tresilian; Guy M Wallis; Craig Mattocks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Eye movements and hazard perception in active and passive driving.

Authors:  Andrew K Mackenzie; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-09-07

10.  Task-specific response strategy selection on the basis of recent training experience.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Fulvio; C Shawn Green; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.