BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcer is a disease most common in those aged 65 years and older. However, the incidence and prevalence have not been well established. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to estimate the prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers in the elderly. METHODS: We studied the General Practice Research Database, validated our case ascertainment strategy, and estimated the annual prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcer. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of our ascertainment strategy was 98.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0, 100.0). The annual prevalence of venous leg ulcer among the elderly was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.65, 1.74). The overall incidence rate was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.83) for men and 1.42 (1.35, 1.48) per 100 person-years for women. CONCLUSION: Venous leg ulcer is a significant problem in those aged 65 years and older. As compared with previous studies, because we used medical records from a population of known size, our results are precise and less biased.
BACKGROUND:Venous leg ulcer is a disease most common in those aged 65 years and older. However, the incidence and prevalence have not been well established. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to estimate the prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers in the elderly. METHODS: We studied the General Practice Research Database, validated our case ascertainment strategy, and estimated the annual prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcer. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of our ascertainment strategy was 98.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0, 100.0). The annual prevalence of venous leg ulcer among the elderly was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.65, 1.74). The overall incidence rate was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.83) for men and 1.42 (1.35, 1.48) per 100 person-years for women. CONCLUSION:Venous leg ulcer is a significant problem in those aged 65 years and older. As compared with previous studies, because we used medical records from a population of known size, our results are precise and less biased.
Authors: Miriam Berenguer Pérez; Pablo López-Casanova; Raquel Sarabia Lavín; Héctor González de la Torre; José Verdú-Soriano Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Elizabeth Scanlon; Tonny Karlsmark; David J Leaper; Kate Carter; Peter B Poulsen; Kristian Hart-Hansen; Tina W Hahn Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Lisa Gould; Peter Abadir; Harold Brem; Marissa Carter; Teresa Conner-Kerr; Jeff Davidson; Luisa DiPietro; Vincent Falanga; Caroline Fife; Sue Gardner; Elizabeth Grice; John Harmon; William R Hazzard; Kevin P High; Pamela Houghton; Nasreen Jacobson; Robert S Kirsner; Elizabeth J Kovacs; David Margolis; Frances McFarland Horne; May J Reed; Dennis H Sullivan; Stephen Thom; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Jeremy Walston; JoAnne Whitney; John Williams; Susan Zieman; Kenneth Schmader Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.617