Literature DB >> 11861732

Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement.

Paul E Beaulé1, Thomas P Schmalzried, Pacharapol Udomkiat, Harlan C Amstutz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of the use of a jumbo femoral head to restore stability in hips that had sustained recurrent dislocations after total hip replacement.
METHODS: Twelve hips in twelve patients who had had multiple hip operations and recurrent instability of the hip underwent a total hip replacement with use of a femoral head with an average diameter of 44 mm (range, 40 to 50 mm). The average age of the patients was fifty-nine years (range, twenty-nine to eighty-four years). The twelve patients had had an average of four previous operations (range, one to eight operations) and seven dislocations (range, two to twenty dislocations). A bipolar head was used in ten hips that had a femoral stem with a fixed (non-modular) head, and a modular head (unipolar) was used in two hips. (One hip was first treated with a bipolar head and then with a unipolar head.)
RESULTS: One patient died of unrelated causes fourteen months postoperatively. The hip had remained stable until the time of death. After an average duration of follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 3.2 to 11.8 years), ten of the remaining eleven hips had had no additional episodes of instability. One hip dislocated within one week after the revision, necessitating revision surgery to reposition the acetabular component. This hip was found to be stable at the time of follow-up 7.6 years after the revision. There were four other reoperations: one was done because of a fracture of the polyethylene; one, because of entrapment of cement within the articulation; one, because of pain related to loosening of the femoral stem; and one, because of late hematogenous infection. The preoperative and postoperative University of California at Los Angeles hip scores for the series were, respectively, 7 and 9 points for pain, 5 and 7 points for walking, 4 and 6 points for function, and 3 and 5 points for activity.
CONCLUSIONS: A jumbo-diameter femoral head provided stability and improved function without compromising range of motion in patients with recurrent dislocations following total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11861732     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  30 in total

1.  Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

2.  Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; Vincent Pibarot; Gualter Vaz; Christophe Chevillotte; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

Authors:  Gianluca Cinotti; Niccolò Lucioli; Andrea Malagoli; Carlo Calderoli; Ferdinando Cassese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement-effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Fu Yuen Ng; Jiang Tao Zhang; Kwong Yuen Chiu; Chun Hoi Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  What factors affect posterior dislocation distance in THA?

Authors:  Jim Nevelos; Aaron Johnson; Christopher Heffernan; James Macintyre; David C Markel; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

7.  Is an algorithmic approach to the treatment of recurrent dislocation after THA effective?

Authors:  Ehsan Saadat; Glenn Diekmann; Steven Takemoto; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: mechanics, morphology, and clinical behavior.

Authors:  M C Sobieraj; C M Rimnac
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-12-25

10.  Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Jean Yves Lazennec; Frederic Khiami; Yves Catonné
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.