Literature DB >> 11861096

Ultrasonic contrast agents: safety considerations reviewed.

G R ter Haar1.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic contrast agents are usually comprised of a stabilised shell encapsulating a gas bubble. When these are introduced in the body they increase the acoustic scattering from the tissues through which they pass, and especially from the vasculature. Their primary uses lie in cardiological and oncological imaging. However, these microbubbles have the potential to act as centres for acoustic cavitation activity, and so it is important to consider the safety of their use from an acoustic standpoint. The addition of ultrasonic contrast agents to in vitro suspensions of red blood cells has been shown to lead to haemolysis when the sample is exposed to ultrasound at levels which leave the cells unharmed in their absence. In vivo the infusion of gas bubble contrast agents into experimental animals has been shown to enhance the incidence of petechiae and haemorrhage in the intestine. The Mechanical Index (MI) thresholds for the effects seen in vitro lie within the range of MIs available with diagnostic clinical scanners, but in vivo the thresholds lie at the top end of the exposure levels available clinically. No adverse effects in humans arising from the ultrasonic exposure of these contrast agents have been reported to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11861096     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00456-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  14 in total

1.  Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound: More than just a fancy Doppler.

Authors:  Rachid M Mohamed; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 2.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Jarl A Jakobsen; Raymond Oyen; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Ultrasound contrast agents--physical basics].

Authors:  C Kollmann; M Putzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Dustin E Kruse; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  New mechanisms for non-porative ultrasound stimulation of cargo delivery to cell cytosol with targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles.

Authors:  Nr Soman; Jn Marsh; Gm Lanza; Sa Wickline
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.874

6.  Application of ultrasound microbubble contrast technology in ophthalmic targeted therapy: literature analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Ying Yuan; Jian-Hua Zhang; Chong Tang; Hong Zhu; Hua Xie; Shuan-Jie Gao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound imaging: basic principles, present situation and future perspectives.

Authors:  María-Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Loss of echogenicity and onset of cavitation from echogenic liposomes: pulse repetition frequency independence.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kevin J Haworth; Tao Peng; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Ultrasound microbubble-mediated delivery of the siRNAs targeting MDR1 reduces drug resistance of yolk sac carcinoma L2 cells.

Authors:  Yun He; Yang Bi; Yi Hua; Dongyao Liu; Sheng Wen; Qiang Wang; Mingyong Li; Jing Zhu; Tao Lin; Dawei He; Xuliang Li; Zhigang Wang; Guanghui Wei
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-28

Review 10.  The use of microbubbles to target drug delivery.

Authors:  Jeane M Tsutsui; Feng Xie; Richard Thomas Porter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.