Literature DB >> 11860048

Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence.

Susan L Kenford1, Stevens S Smith, David W Wetter, Douglas E Jorenby, Michael C Fiore, Timothy B Baker.   

Abstract

Traditional models of physical dependence suggest that nicotine dependence should be reflected by the extent of drug exposure (e.g., smoking rate) and by evidence of physiological adaptation (e.g., withdrawal severity). An affective model suggests that nicotine dependence should be related to an individual's tendency to experience negative affect and expectations that nicotine use would ameliorate such affect. This research investigated the ability of these 2 models to predict relapse back to smoking at 6 months postquit. Logistic regression models were developed and tested in 505 heavy smokers participating in nicotine patch clinical trials. Results supported both models, but the most potent predictor of outcome was postquit negative affect, which accounted for much of the predictive validity of traditional measures of nicotine dependence. Affective reactivity appears to be a core constituent of dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11860048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  106 in total

1.  Ecological momentary analysis of the relations among stressful events, affective reactivity, and smoking among smokers with high versus low depressive symptoms during a quit attempt.

Authors:  Haruka Minami; Brandon E Frank; Krysten W Bold; Danielle E McCarthy
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Smoking cessation and quality of life: changes in life satisfaction over 3 years following a quit attempt.

Authors:  Megan E Piper; Susan Kenford; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  The validity of the reinstatement model of craving and relapse to drug use.

Authors:  Jonathan L Katz; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Smoking outcome expectancies in military veteran smokers with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Timothy P Carmody; Miles McFall; Andrew J Saxon; Carol A Malte; Bruce Chow; Anne M Joseph; Jean C Beckham; Jessica W Cook
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Pharmacotherapy for tobacco cessation: nicotine agonists, antagonists, and partial agonists.

Authors:  Maher Karam-Hage; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Individual and combined effects of multiple high-risk triggers on postcessation smoking urge and lapse.

Authors:  Cho Y Lam; Michael S Businelle; Carrie J Aigner; Jennifer B McClure; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Paul M Cinciripini; David W Wetter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 7.  Smoking cessation: significance and implications for children.

Authors:  Andrea T Borchers; Carl L Keen; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 8.  Targeting the noradrenergic system for gender-sensitive medication development for tobacco dependence.

Authors:  Terril L Verplaetse; Andrea H Weinberger; Philip H Smith; Kelly P Cosgrove; Yann S Mineur; Marina R Picciotto; Carolyn M Mazure; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Sex differences in acute relief of abstinence-induced withdrawal and negative affect due to nicotine content in cigarettes.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Sex differences in hormonal responses to stress and smoking relapse: a prospective examination.

Authors:  Mustafa al'Absi; Motohiro Nakajima; Sharon Allen; Andrine Lemieux; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.