J Saldanha1, N Lelie, M W Yu, A Heath. 1. Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls, South Mimms, Herts., UK. jsaldanha@nibsc.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A collaborative study, involving 26 laboratories from 14 countries, was carried out in order to establish a World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard for human parvovirus B19 (B19) DNA nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four samples: AA, BB (which were lyophilized), CC and DD (which were liquid preparations) were analysed using several different NAT assays. The mean B19 DNA content of each sample was determined for each laboratory using an end-point dilution method. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the overall mean 'equivalents'/ml obtained by the different assays. The mean log(10) 'equivalents'/ml were 5.76 for sample AA, 5.73 for sample BB, 5.82 for sample CC and 7.70 for sample DD. The differences in titre among samples AA, BB and CC were not statistically significant, but the titre of DD was significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the range of NAT assays used in the study, it was possible to calculate the mean B19 DNA concentrations in the four preparations. Lyophilized preparation AA was established as the first International Standard for B19 DNA NAT assays and was assigned a concentration of 10(6) international units (IU)/ml.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A collaborative study, involving 26 laboratories from 14 countries, was carried out in order to establish a World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard for human parvovirus B19 (B19) DNA nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four samples: AA, BB (which were lyophilized), CC and DD (which were liquid preparations) were analysed using several different NAT assays. The mean B19 DNA content of each sample was determined for each laboratory using an end-point dilution method. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the overall mean 'equivalents'/ml obtained by the different assays. The mean log(10) 'equivalents'/ml were 5.76 for sample AA, 5.73 for sample BB, 5.82 for sample CC and 7.70 for sample DD. The differences in titre among samples AA, BB and CC were not statistically significant, but the titre of DD was significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the range of NAT assays used in the study, it was possible to calculate the mean B19 DNA concentrations in the four preparations. Lyophilized preparation AA was established as the first International Standard for B19 DNA NAT assays and was assigned a concentration of 10(6) international units (IU)/ml.
Authors: F Wiesmann; G Naeth; C Sarrazin; A Berger; R Kaiser; R Ehret; H Knechten; P Braun Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Roberta M Madej; Jack Davis; Marcia J Holden; Stan Kwang; Emmanuel Labourier; George J Schneider Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Johannes Blümel; Reinhard Burger; Christian Drosten; Albrecht Gröner; Lutz Gürtler; Margarethe Heiden; Martin Hildebrandt; Bernd Jansen; Thomas Montag-Lessing; Ruth Offergeld; Georg Pauli; Rainer Seitz; Uwe Schlenkrich; Volkmar Schottstedt; Johanna Strobel; Hannelore Willkommen; Carl-Heinz Wirsing von König Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Tzong-Hae Lee; Steven H Kleinman; Li Wen; Lani Montalvo; Deborah S Todd; David J Wright; Leslie H Tobler; Michael P Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-02-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Johannes Blümel; Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger; Albert Stühler; Claudia Bönsch; Matthias Gessner; Johannes Löwer Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: R T Hayden; K M Hokanson; S B Pounds; M J Bankowski; S W Belzer; J Carr; D Diorio; M S Forman; Y Joshi; D Hillyard; R L Hodinka; M N Nikiforova; C A Romain; J Stevenson; A Valsamakis; H H Balfour Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Kati Hokynar; Päivi Norja; Harri Laitinen; Pekka Palomäki; Antoine Garbarg-Chenon; Annamari Ranki; Klaus Hedman; Maria Söderlund-Venermo Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.948