Literature DB >> 11856139

Long-term results of antireflux surgery indicate the need for a randomized clinical trial.

R Sandbu1, H Khamis, S Gustavsson, U Haglund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well conducted, comparative trials of laparoscopic versus open antireflux surgery with an adequate patient enrollment are few and they do not demonstrate obvious advantages for the laparoscopic approach except for a marginal gain in shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open procedures.
METHODS: Two unselected groups of 230 patients were identified through a register of all inpatient public care in Sweden. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery were compared using a disease-specific questionnaire 4 years after operation.
RESULTS: Failure and dissatisfaction were significantly more common in the laparoscopy group than among patients having conventional open surgery. Treatment failure rates were 29.0 and 14.6 per cent respectively (P = 0.004). Dissatisfaction rates were 15.0 and 7.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.005). There was no other questionnaire item for which the proportion of failures differed significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: This study does not support the presumption that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is to be preferred to the open procedure. It is strongly recommended that a randomized controlled trial be conducted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11856139     DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01990.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

1.  Five-year subjective and objective results of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Werner A Draaisma; Hilda G Rijnhart-de Jong; Ivo A M J Broeders; Andre J P M Smout; Edgar J B Furnee; Hein G Gooszen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparison of Laparoscopic 270° Posterior Partial Fundoplication vs Total Fundoplication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bengt S Håkanson; Lars Lundell; Ami Bylund; Anders Thorell
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Open vs laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  B S Håkanson; K B A Thor; A Thorell; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs.

Authors:  J Dent; D Armstrong; B Delaney; P Moayyedi; N J Talley; N Vakil
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Mechanical consequences of short gastric vessel division at the time of laparoscopic total fundoplication.

Authors:  Cecilia Engström; Anne Blomqvist; Jan Dalenbäck; Hans Lönroth; Magnus Ruth; Lars Lundell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Radiologic and endoscopic characteristics of laparoscopic antireflux wrap: correlation with outcome.

Authors:  Italo Braghetto; Owen Korn; Attila Csendes; Héctor Valladares; Cristóbal Davanzo; Aníbal Debandi
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

7.  Comparing laparoscopic antireflux surgery with esomeprazole in the management of patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year interim analysis of the LOTUS trial.

Authors:  L Lundell; S Attwood; C Ell; R Fiocca; J-P Galmiche; J Hatlebakk; T Lind; O Junghard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 23.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.