Literature DB >> 11854390

Outcomes among African-American/non-African-American patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

A William Blackstock1, James E Herndon, Electra D Paskett, Michael C Perry, Stephen L Graziano, Joseph J Muscato, Michael P Kosty, Wallace L Akerley, Jimmie Holland, Stewart Fleishman, Mark R Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients diagnosed with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), African-Americans have lower survival rates than non-African-Americans. Whether this difference is due to innate characteristics of the disease in the two ethnicities or to disparities in health care is not known. We investigated whether the disparity in survival would persist when patients were treated with similar systemic therapies (i.e., in phase II and phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] trials).
METHODS: We assessed 504 consecutive patients (458 non-African-American and 46 African-American) receiving systemic chemotherapy in CALGB studies for advanced NSCLC during the period from 1989 through 1998. Clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment received, and survival data were obtained from the CALGB database. Cox's proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of race/ethnicity on survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: The unadjusted 1-year survival rate was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13% to 38%) for African-American patients and 30% (95% CI = 26% to 35%) for non-African-American patients, a statistically significant difference (8%; 95% CI on the difference = 5% to 12%; P =.03). Multivariable adjustment for the effect of treatment arm, histology, and metastatic site at presentation did not alter the worse outcome for African-American patients. However, the effect of race/ethnicity disappeared after adjustment for performance status and weight loss. African-American patients were more likely than non-African-Americans to present with a poor performance status (83% versus 60%) and substantial weight loss (41% versus 27%) and to be unmarried (59% versus 28%), disabled (31% versus 15%), unemployed (17% versus 7%), and Medicaid recipients (30% versus 8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship that we observed between poor performance, weight loss, and socioeconomic status suggests that social circumstances lead to African-Americans presenting with poorer prognostic features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11854390     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.4.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  31 in total

Review 1.  Social, prognostic, and therapeutic factors associated with cancer survival: a population-based study in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Eric J Holowaty; Ethan Laukkanen; Isaac N Luginaah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2003-11

2.  End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Angel Cronin; Nathan Taback; Haiden A Huskamp; Nancy L Keating; Jennifer L Malin; Craig C Earle; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio associated with prognosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  V Bar-Ad; J Palmer; L Li; Y Lai; B Lu; R E Myers; Z Ye; R Axelrod; J M Johnson; M Werner-Wasik; S W Cowan; N R Evans; B T Hehn; C C Solomides; C Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Gender, race, and socioeconomic status affects outcomes after lung cancer resections in the United States.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; David A Harris; Benjamin D Kozower; David R Jones; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi; Christine L Lau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Lung cancer health disparities.

Authors:  Bríd M Ryan
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Temporal evolution of patient characteristics enrolled on phase I trials.

Authors:  Afshin Dowlati; Madappa Kundranda; Sudhir Manda; Lauren Patrick; Pingfu Fu
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Racial differences in the perception of lung cancer: the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Christopher S Lathan; Cassandra Okechukwu; Bettina F Drake; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Erlotinib in African Americans with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study with genetic and pharmacokinetic analyses.

Authors:  M A Phelps; T E Stinchcombe; J S Blachly; W Zhao; L J Schaaf; S L Starrett; L Wei; M Poi; D Wang; A Papp; J Aimiuwu; Y Gao; J Li; G A Otterson; W J Hicks; M A Socinski; M A Villalona-Calero
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  COX-2/EGFR expression and survival among women with adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Alison L Van Dyke; Michele L Cote; Geoffrey M Prysak; Gina B Claeys; Angie S Wenzlaff; Valerie C Murphy; Fulvio Lonardo; Ann G Schwartz
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Associations between end-of-life discussion characteristics and care received near death: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Angel Cronin; Nancy L Keating; Nathan Taback; Haiden A Huskamp; Jennifer L Malin; Craig C Earle; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.