Literature DB >> 23150700

Associations between end-of-life discussion characteristics and care received near death: a prospective cohort study.

Jennifer W Mack1, Angel Cronin, Nancy L Keating, Nathan Taback, Haiden A Huskamp, Jennifer L Malin, Craig C Earle, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: National guidelines recommend that discussions about end-of-life (EOL) care planning happen early for patients with incurable cancer. We do not know whether earlier EOL discussions lead to less aggressive care near death. We sought to evaluate the extent to which EOL discussion characteristics, such as timing, involved providers, and location, are associated with the aggressiveness of care received near death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 1,231 patients with stage IV lung or colorectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium, a population- and health system-based prospective cohort study, who died during the 15-month study period but survived at least 1 month. Our main outcome measure was the aggressiveness of EOL care received.
RESULTS: Nearly half of patients received at least one marker of aggressive EOL care, including chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life (16%), intensive care unit care in the last 30 days of life (9%), and acute hospital-based care in the last 30 days of life (40%). Patients who had EOL discussions with their physicians before the last 30 days of life were less likely to receive aggressive measures at EOL, including chemotherapy (P = .003), acute care (P < .001), or any aggressive care (P < .001). Such patients were also more likely to receive hospice care (P < .001) and to have hospice initiated earlier (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Early EOL discussions are prospectively associated with less aggressive care and greater use of hospice at EOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23150700      PMCID: PMC3675701          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.6055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

Review 1.  Discussing palliative care with patients. ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.

Authors:  B Lo; T Quill; J Tulsky
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Elyse R Park; Bonnie Lai; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Susan Block
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Illness trajectories and palliative care.

Authors:  Scott A Murray; Marilyn Kendall; Kirsty Boyd; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-30

4.  Evaluating claims-based indicators of the intensity of end-of-life cancer care.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; Jeffrey M Souza; Jane C Weeks; Susan D Block; Eva Grunfeld; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences.

Authors:  J C Weeks; E F Cook; S J O'Day; L M Peterson; N Wenger; D Reding; F E Harrell; P Kussin; N V Dawson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Determinants of hospice utilization among terminally ill geriatric patients.

Authors:  H G Prigerson
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  1991

7.  Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; John Z Ayanian; Susan D Block; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Understanding cancer patients' experience and outcomes: development and pilot study of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance patient survey.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Clifford Ko; John Z Ayanian; David Harrington; David R Nerenz; Katherine L Kahn; Julie Ganther-Urmie; Paul J Catalano; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert B Wallace; Edward Guadagnoli; Neeraj K Arora; Maryse D Roudier; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Glenn Gade; Ingrid Venohr; Douglas Conner; Kathleen McGrady; Jeffrey Beane; Robert H Richardson; Marilyn P Williams; Marcia Liberson; Mark Blum; Richard Della Penna
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care.

Authors:  Richard Brumley; Susan Enguidanos; Paula Jamison; Rae Seitz; Nora Morgenstern; Sherry Saito; Jan McIlwane; Kristine Hillary; Jorge Gonzalez
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  137 in total

1.  Goals of care discussions: perceptions of radiation and medical oncologists.

Authors:  Daniel Hong; Lauren C Das; Ellen Daily; Stacie K Levine; Olwen M Hahn; Stanley L Liauw; Daniel W Golden; Christina H Son
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  "This is not me": patient, family, cultural and clinician considerations in cases of severe cancer-related debility.

Authors:  Daneng Li; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Aaron D Viny; Meredith Cammarata; Ali Shamseddine; Ashwaq Al-Olayan; Hibah Osman; Ali Haydar; Ghassan Kanazi; Mohamed Naghy; Eileen M O'Reilly; Andrew S Epstein
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10

Review 3.  Update in hospice and palliative care.

Authors:  Katherine A Roza; Jay R Horton; Kimberly Johnson; Wendy G Anderson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Room for improvement: An examination of advance care planning documentation among gynecologic oncology patients.

Authors:  Alaina J Brown; Megan Johnson Shen; Diana Urbauer; Jolyn Taylor; Patricia A Parker; Cindy Carmack; Lauren Prescott; Elizabeth Kolawole; Carly Rosemore; Charlotte Sun; Lois Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  From the first visit on: information technology and communication.

Authors:  J Russell Hoverman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Timing of code status documentation and end-of-life outcomes in patients admitted to an oncology ward.

Authors:  Amanda Caissie; Nanor Kevork; Breffni Hannon; Lisa W Le; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Systematic Approach to Selecting and Preparing a Medical Power of Attorney in the Gynecologic Oncology Center.

Authors:  Donna S Zhukovsky; Pamela T Soliman; Boby Mathew; Sarah Mills; Diane Bodurka; Michael Frumovitz; Larissa A Meyer; Shannon Westin; Marisa Nowitz; LaShan Archie; Shauna Fenton; Kai Lang; Janet L Williams; Valentine Boving; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Early palliative care in cancer treatment: rationale, evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Lynn Howie; Jeffrey Peppercorn
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Racial Disparities in Health Care Utilization at the End of Life Among New Jersey Medicaid Beneficiaries With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Annie Yang; David Goldin; Jose Nova; Jyoti Malhotra; Joel C Cantor; Jennifer Tsui
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-04-16

10.  AMEN in challenging conversations: bridging the gaps between faith, hope, and medicine.

Authors:  Rhonda S Cooper; Anna Ferguson; Joann N Bodurtha; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.