OBJECTIVE: To test a modification of the circumareolar incision for correction of a gynaecomastia from the points of view of complications and appearance of the scar. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Military and university hospitals, Turkey. SUBJECTS: 32 patients with gynaecomastia operated on between 1992 and 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Simon I patients were treated with an inferior semicircular periareolar incision (n = 12). Half of the Simon II patients had the same incision and the others were treated with a modified extended incision (n = 10 in each group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Haematoma, skin necrosis, nipple inversion, low-seated nipple, asymmetry, hypoaesthesia and hypertrophic scar. RESULTS: Simon II patients treated with the unmodified incision had more haematomas and seromas than Simon I patients and worse cosmesis (p = 0.009 and p = 0.02). However, the complication rates did not differ significantly compared with the Simon II patients who had the modified incision. CONCLUSION: A modified extended circumareolar incision results in fewer complication and better cosmesis in grade II gynaecomastia than the standard incision.
OBJECTIVE: To test a modification of the circumareolar incision for correction of a gynaecomastia from the points of view of complications and appearance of the scar. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Military and university hospitals, Turkey. SUBJECTS: 32 patients with gynaecomastia operated on between 1992 and 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Simon I patients were treated with an inferior semicircular periareolar incision (n = 12). Half of the Simon II patients had the same incision and the others were treated with a modified extended incision (n = 10 in each group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Haematoma, skin necrosis, nipple inversion, low-seated nipple, asymmetry, hypoaesthesia and hypertrophic scar. RESULTS: Simon II patients treated with the unmodified incision had more haematomas and seromas than Simon I patients and worse cosmesis (p = 0.009 and p = 0.02). However, the complication rates did not differ significantly compared with the Simon II patients who had the modified incision. CONCLUSION: A modified extended circumareolar incision results in fewer complication and better cosmesis in grade II gynaecomastia than the standard incision.