Literature DB >> 11847613

Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years' follow-up.

Martin Lind1, Niels Krarup, Søren Mikkelsen, Erik Hørlyck.   

Abstract

A total of 87 femoral exchange revision procedures were performed in 80 patients. Mean follow-up time was 3.6 years. Patients were followed prospectively. At follow-up, 5 patients had died, and 74 (93 %) completed follow-up. Results were evaluated on the basis of incidence of re-revisions and other complications, patient satisfaction, and preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative femoral bone status evaluated according to Endo-Klinik and Mallory, incidence of subsidence, bone-graft incorporation, and signs of loosening. Three patients were re-revised, 2 patients suffered postoperative femoral fractures, 5 patients had hip dislocations, and 1 patient suffered deep infection. Of patients, 90% expressed satisfaction with the result. Harris hip score improved from 39 to 82 (P <.001). Radiographically, only 2 patients showed subsidence of >5 mm. Of patients, 88% showed signs of graft incorporation, and only 1 patient showed signs of loosening. Intermediate follow-up evaluation of the exchange femoral revision technique showed good clinical and radiographic results. With a re-revision rate of 3.5% and incidence of >5 mm subsidence of 2.5%, we did not observe the problems of subsidence and femoral fractures that previous studies have described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11847613     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.29391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  No effect of platelet-rich plasma with frozen or processed bone allograft around noncemented implants.

Authors:  T B Jensen; O Rahbek; S Overgaard; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft.

Authors:  Oleg Safir; Catherine F Kellett; Michael Flint; David Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?

Authors:  Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Derek Bennett; Ronald E Delanois; Khaled J Saleh; Issada Thongtrangan; Michael Kuskowski; Edward Y Cheng; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi; James B Stiehl; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jbt Lim; H N Pang; Kjd Tay; S L Chia; S J Yeo; N N Lo
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2020-11

5.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bovine bone biocompatibility.

Authors:  Carlos Roberto Galia; Carlos Alberto Macedo; Ricardo Rosito; Tielle Muller de Mello; Lourdes Maria Araújo Quaresma Camargo; Luis Fernando Moreira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF LYOPHILIZED BOVINE BONE GRAFTS.

Authors:  Carlos Roberto Galia; André Luis Lourenço; Ricardo Rosito; Carlos Alberto Souza Macedo; Lourdes Maria Araujo Quaresma Camargo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17

7.  BOVINE LYOPHILIZED GRAFT (BLG): HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ON BEHAVIOR IN HUMANS AFTER 49 MONTHS.

Authors:  Carlos Roberto Galia; Giuseppe De Luca; Luiz Müller Ávila; Ricardo Rosito; Carlos Alberto Souza Macedo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.