Literature DB >> 11847134

Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand.

Leanne Young1, Boyd Swinburn.   

Abstract

The Pick the Tick programme of the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand aims to provide a framework for cooperation with the food industry to improve nutrition labelling and to develop a healthy food supply. Food manufacturers, whose products meet defined nutritional criteria, are able to display the Pick the Tick logo on food labels. The tick is used by 59% of shoppers in assisting them make healthy food choices. Food companies are encouraged to reformulate product composition if they fail to meet criteria and develop new products to specifically meet the Pick the Tick criteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the programme on food formulation. The main outcome measure was the amount of salt not added to food products. Changes to sodium levels were multiplied by the volume of sales and then converted to salt in tonnes to provide a tangible measure of the impact of the programme. In a 1-year period, July 1998 to June 1999, Pick the Tick influenced food companies to exclude approximately 33 tonnes of salt through the reformulation and formulation of 23 breads, breakfast cereals and margarine. Breakfast cereals showed the largest reduction in sodium content by an average of 378 mg sodium per 100 g product (61%). Bread was reduced by an average of 123 mg per 100 g product (26%) and margarine by 53 mg per 100 g (11%). Pick the Tick appeals to the food industry as a tool for marketing food products and has provided an incentive to improve the nutritional value of foods. The tick on approved products not only acts as a 'nutrition signpost' for consumers but can also significantly influence the formulation of products without sacrificing taste or quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11847134     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/17.1.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  41 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Formulation, Labelling, and Taxation Policies on the Nutritional Quality of the Food Supply.

Authors:  Stefanie Vandevijvere; Lana Vanderlee
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  Epidemic obesity in children and adolescents: risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Eun Young Lee; Kun-Ho Yoon
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Ellis L Vyth; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Annet Jc Roodenburg; Johannes Brug; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Obesity management: what brings success?

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Stephan Rössner
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  A Meta-Analysis of Food Labeling Effects on Consumer Diet Behaviors and Industry Practices.

Authors:  Siyi Shangguan; Ashkan Afshin; Masha Shulkin; Wenjie Ma; Daniel Marsden; Jessica Smith; Michael Saheb-Kashaf; Peilin Shi; Renata Micha; Fumiaki Imamura; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  The cardio-protective diet.

Authors:  S Sivasankaran
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Effect of restrictions on television food advertising to children on exposure to advertisements for 'less healthy' foods: repeat cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jean Adams; Rachel Tyrrell; Ashley J Adamson; Martin White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention.

Authors:  Mahshid Dehghan; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Anwar T Merchant
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Ingrid Borgmeier; Joachim Westenhoefer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Which interventions offer best value for money in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Linda J Cobiac; Anne Magnus; Stephen Lim; Jan J Barendregt; Rob Carter; Theo Vos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.