Literature DB >> 11846331

Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years.

A N Tosteson1, S E Gabriel, M R Grove, M M Moncur, T S Kneeland, L J Melton.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to estimate the impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women using a preference-based health measure that is appropriate for economic evaluations and to investigate correlates of health outcome. Interviews to assess health-related quality of life, which also documented other health conditions and characteristics, were undertaken in women age 50 years and older without osteoporotic fractures compared with women with hip and/or vertebral fracture(s). Health status was characterized by self-reported physical limitations and the mental and physical component summary scores of the SF-36. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which reflect each individual's assessment of her overall health utility, were estimated with time tradeoff values. Regression methods were used to examine QALY correlates (e.g. time since fracture) for each fracture group and to estimate differences in QALYs between fracture and non-fracture subjects after accounting for other patient characteristics. Among 382 women ages 50-96 years, fracture subjects were significantly older, less likely to use hormone replacement therapy and more likely to report physical limitations than non-fracture subjects. On the QALY scale, where 1 represents perfect health and 0 represents death, mean QALY values were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.87) among 114 women with one or more vertebral fractures and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.74) among 67 with hip fracture compared with 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) among 201 women without fracture. No significant correlates of QALYs were identified among women with vertebral fracture alone. Among hip fracture subjects, time since hip fracture and presence of a vertebral fracture were significant correlates of QALYs. In multiple regression analyses, estimated QALY differences (fracture minus non-fracture subjects) ranged from -0.05 to -0.55 and were equivalent to losses of 20-58 days, 23-65 days and 115-202 days per year for vertebral fracture (p = 0.001), hip fracture (p = 0.009) and hip plus vertebral fracture (p<0.001) subjects, respectively, depending on age. Thus to adequately assess the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment, the negative impact of vertebral fractures on QALYs, even among women who have survived a hip fracture, must be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11846331     DOI: 10.1007/s001980170015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  89 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Evaluation of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Taiwan version in assessing elderly patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu; Jui-fen Rachel Lu; Jersey Liang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Significance of intima-media thickness in femoral artery in the determination of calcaneus osteo-sono index but not of lumbar spine bone mass in healthy Japanese people.

Authors:  Shinsuke Yamada; Masaaki Inaba; Hitoshi Goto; Mayumi Nagata; Misako Ueda; Kiyoshi Nakatuka; Hideki Tahara; Hisayo Yokoyama; Masanori Emoto; Tetsuo Shoji; Yoshiki Nishizawa
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Type 2 diabetes and bone fractures.

Authors:  Kendall F Moseley
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Prophylactic Fixation Can Be Cost-effective in Preventing a Contralateral Bisphosphonate-associated Femur Fracture.

Authors:  Sam Y Jiang; David J Kaufman; Bonnie Y Chien; Michael Longoria; Ross Shachter; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions.

Authors:  David J Vanness; Anna N A Tosteson; Sherine E Gabriel; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact of vertebral deformities, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases on quality of life: a population-based study.

Authors:  N M van Schoor; J H Smit; J W R Twisk; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Cross-geographic region differences in quality of life in women with and without vertebral fracture.

Authors:  N M van Schoor; H Yu; J Bobula; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; F Borgstrom; N Zethraeus; C De Laet; B Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Cost-equivalence of different osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  L J Melton; S E Gabriel; C S Crowson; A N A Tosteson; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.