Literature DB >> 11846199

Sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction: success and failure rates of 137 implants in function for up to 3 years.

Paul A Fugazzotto, Paoli Sergio De.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant restoration of the posterior maxilla poses significant challenges to the clinician. In an effort to increase the apical occlusal dimension of available bone for implant placement, a number of sinus augmentation approaches have been suggested. This paper describes a simplified technique for predictable sinus augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction.
METHODS: A modified trephine and osteotome technique was utilized to implode the interradicular bone following maxillary molar extraction. Particulate material and a membrane were then placed to maximize regeneration of alveolar bone.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven (167) implants were subsequently placed in regenerated bone following the above technique. One hundred thirty-seven (137) of these implants were restored and in function for up to 3 years at the time of statistical compilation, and 136 of the 137 implants were functioning successfully by the Albrekteson criteria for a cumulative success rate of 97.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique presented for simultaneous sinus augmentation at the time of molar extraction, followed by subsequent implant placement after maturation of regenerating tissues, demonstrates a high success rate for up to 3 years in function. Long-term studies may be useful in evaluating the continual efficacy of such an approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11846199     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of dentists' subjective satisfaction with a newly developed device for maxillary sinus membrane elevation by the crestal approach.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Yong-Seok Cho; Pil-Young Yun
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Clinical treatment of postoperative infection following sinus augmentation.

Authors:  Seung-Bum Hong; Jae-Suk Kim; Seung-Il Shin; Ji-Young Han; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 3.  Survival of implants placed with the osteotome technique: an update.

Authors:  Jose Viña-Almunia; Laura Maestre-Ferrín; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; María Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 4.  Indirect sinus lift without bone graft material: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Pérez-Martínez; Luis Martorell-Calatayud; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Berta García-Mira; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-04-01

5.  Comparing alveolar bone regeneration using Bio-Oss and autogenous bone grafts in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Azam Dehghani; Farzin Ghanavati; Farid Zayeri; Farzam Ghanavati
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2009-10-10

6.  Indirect Sinus Lift Done Using "Autogenous Core Lift" Technique in Combination with Alloplastic Phosphosilicate Putty in Atrophic Maxillary Posterior Region: A Clinical Report with 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Umesh Y Pai; Shobha Rodrigues; Puneeth Hegde; Nikita Khurana
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

7.  Radiographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus prior to dental implant therapy: A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic imaging.

Authors:  Aditya Tadinada; Karen Fung; Sejal Thacker; Mina Mahdian; Aniket Jadhav; Gian Pietro Schincaglia
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-09-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.