Literature DB >> 26155353

Indirect sinus lift without bone graft material: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sara Pérez-Martínez1, Luis Martorell-Calatayud2, David Peñarrocha-Oltra2, Berta García-Mira3, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago4.   

Abstract

A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of indirect sinus lift without the use of bone graft material was performed. A PubMed search was made from January 2005 to January 2012 with keywords: "sinus lift", "osteotome", "graft" and "maxillary sinus elevation". The inclusion criteria were: maxillary sinus lift technique with osteotomes with a minimum follow-up period of 5 months after surgery without bone graft material. 11 articles were included. The mean gain in residual crestal bone height after maxillary sinus lift without bone graft material was 3,43 mm ± 0,09 (2,5 mm - 4,4 mm). The survival rate ranged from 94% to 100%. Placement of implants with sinus lift without bone graft material, is a valid surgical technique to gain residual crestal height and placed implants in an atrophic posterior maxillary with a crestal height from 5 to 9 mm. Key words:Sinus lift, osteotome, graft, maxillary sinus elevation.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26155353      PMCID: PMC4483344          DOI: 10.4317/jced.51716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


Introduction

An important requirement for the correct placement of the implant is the presence of an adequate quantity and quality of residual bone (1). In 1994 Summers introduced the sinus lift technique with the use of osteotomes combined with graft material around the implant. This technique is a well-validated surgical option for situations with limited residual bone height; ≥ to 5-6 mm (2-4). The survival rate of implants placed simultaneously with indirect sinus lift with bone graft material ranges between 93.5% and 100% (5-6). The bone graft material allows to keep the volume of the sinus membrane after performing indirect elevation (7). The choice of material has been controversial for years to authors. Recently, several studies have reported favorable results when performing indirect sinus lifts without the use of any bone graft (7-11). The authors agree that graft material is not necessary to promote osseointegration and maintain optimal bone volume around the implant, while the absence of graft reduces the risk of infections (12). The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the treatment outcome of indirect sinus lift without graft material according to bone height gained after placement of dental implants.

Material and Methods

A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for articles published between January 2005 and January 2012 on indirect sinus lift without the use of bone graft material. The following keywords individually or in combination were used: “sinus augmentation” OR “sinus elevation” OR “sinus lift” AND “indirect” OR “transcrestal”. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant studies. -Inclusion criteria: • Use of indirect sinus elevation in the atrophic maxilla with osteotomes and without the use of bone graft material • Minimum follow-up of 5 months after surgery • Studies reporting at least survival rate of implants placed after the sinus lift procedure • Full text in English or Spanish -Exclusion criteria: • Systematic reviews • Clinical cases • Studies on direct sinus lift or comparing between direct and indirect elevation The initial search yielded 289 articles. 193 were excluded after checking the title. 85 additional studies were excluded after checking the abstract: 8 for being literature reviews, 14 for being series of clinical cases, 12 reported the performance of indirect sinus elevation with techniques different from the osteotome technique, 7 for not providing all the required variables, 12 for being studies on direct sinus lift, 19 for involving the use of bone graft material and 13 for being in a language different from English or Spanish. Full texts were reviewed for a total of 12 articles. The following variables were registered: number of patients, age at the time of the intervention, number of implants placed, follow-up period, residual bone height before the sinus lift procedure, height gained to the sinus, implant survival rate and pe-ri-implant marginal bone loss ( Table 1) (8,9,13-20).
Table 1

Studies included in the review.

Articles reported by the same research group on the same sample of patients at different follow-up times were grouped; data with the longest follow-up were used for the statistical analysis. Three articles by Nedir et al. (9,13,14) and 2 by Fermergard et al. (15,16) were grouped. -Statistical analysis A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall gain to the maxillary sinus, but it could not be performed for implant survival due to the lack of homogeneity in the follow-up time between studies. The estimate was based on the average weighted by the inverse of the variance, using a confidence interval of 95%. The significance level used in the analysis was 5% (α = 0.05).

Results

The 8 included studies grouped a total of 461 implants in 278 patients. -Sinus gain Eight of the reviewed articles (8,9,13-18) involving 5 different patient samples reported sinus height gained after indirect elevation ( Table 2). The lowest sinus height gained was reported by the three studies on the same patient sample (9,17,18) with 2.5 mm; the greatest height gain was 4.4 mm and it was reported by Fermergard et al. in 2 articles on the same sample (15,16). Nedir et al. (9,13,14) measured the sinus height gained 1, 3 and 5 years after performing indirect sinus lift without graft, and reported increasing values of 2.5 ± 1.2 mm, 3.1 ± 1.5 mm and 3.2 ± 1.3 mm respectively. Fermergard et al. (15,16) conducted a similar study and reported the same sinus height gain (4.4 ± 0.2 mm) after 1 and 5 years. Leblebicioglu et al. (8) obtained 3.3 ± 1.60 mm of sinus height gain after a mean follow-up of 24.6 ± 7 months.
Table 2

Statistical analysis of the gain to the sinus.

Table 2 describes the bone gain outcomes of each study and the combined outcomes for the 5 studies. In all studies, the gain to the maxillary sinus was significantly non-zero (p <0.001). The mean overall gain calculated for all studies was 3.43 mm, with a standard error of 0.095 and a confidence interval of 95% (3.24 to 3.62). -Survival rate of implants The survival rate of the implants was studied in all the 12 articles and ranged from 94% to 100%. The lowest survival rates were reported by two studies: Gabbert et al. (19) reported six failures out of 92 implants placed (implant survival rate of 93.5%), all caused by a lack of osseointegration during the first 6 months. Fermergard et al. (15) obtained a survival rate of 94% after a follow up of three years. Some of the articles reviewed, reported the survival rate of the implants and the mean residual bone height, which allowed to study implant survival depending on the residual bone height (8-11,13-16,20). Nedir et al. (9,13,14) recorded a survival rate of 100% after 1, 3 and 5 years, with a residual average height of 5.4 mm. Senyilmaz et al. (11) obtained a survival rate of 100% at 2 years for residual bone heights ranging between 5 and 10 mm. Fermergard et al. (15) reported two failures (survival rate 96%) with a residual bone of 6.3 ± 0.3 mm. After a period of three years, the same authors (16) recorded another failed implant, obtaining a survival rate of 94%. Bruschi et al. (20) studied the survival rate with the lowest residual bone height (2.11 ± 0.89 mm). Three failed implants were reported yielding a survival rate of 95.4% after a mean follow-up of 10.43 ± 5.01 years. Lai et al. (10) and Leblebicioglu et al. (8) reported survival rates of 95.2% and 97.3% with bony residual ridges of 6.4 ± 1.97 mm and 9.1 mm respectively.

Conclusions

The limited evidence available suggests that indirect sinus lift without the use of bone graft material could be a valid technique to treat with implants atrophic posterior maxillae with residual heights between 5 and 9 mm. The reviewed studies reported a mean bone height gain of 3.43 ± 0.09 mm and implant survival rates ranging between 93.5% and 100%. However, more studies, with bigger samples, providing controlled groups treated with bone graft material and involving evaluation with cone beam computed tomographic scans performed at different timepoints are necessary.
  20 in total

1.  Sinus floor elevation using osteotome technique without grafting materials: a 2-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Longlong He; Xiaofeng Chang; Yanpu Liu
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement in the atrophic maxilla: a pilot study.

Authors:  D P Senyilmaz; O Kasaboglu
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

3.  Implants placed in combination with an internal sinus lift without graft material: an analysis of short-term failure.

Authors:  Olaf Gabbert; Andreas Koob; Marc Schmitter; Peter Rammelsberg
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts--a 3-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.

Authors:  Robert Fermergård; Per Åstrand
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Transalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: Radiographic tissue remodeling.

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Diana Ignjatovic; Giedre Matuliene; Urs Brägger; Kurt Schmidlin; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Placement of tapered implants using an osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without bone grafting: 1-year results.

Authors:  Rabah Nedir; Nathalie Nurdin; Serge Szmukler-Moncler; Mark Bischof
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique.

Authors:  R B Summers
Journal:  Compendium       Date:  1994-02

8.  Sinus membrane elevation in combination with placement of blasted implants: a 3-year case report of sinus augmentation without grafting material.

Authors:  E Sani; M Veltri; M C Cagidiaco; P Balleri; M Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Resonance frequency analysis of stability on ITI implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting: a 5-month prospective study.

Authors:  Hong-Chang Lai; Zhi-Yong Zhang; Feng Wang; Long-Fei Zhuang; Xin Liu
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting material: 3-year results of a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Rabah Nedir; Mark Bischof; Lydia Vazquez; Nathalie Nurdin; Serge Szmukler-Moncler; Jean-Pierre Bernard
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  10 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Novel Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation Technique.

Authors:  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Anahita Moscowchi; Zeinab Zamani; Reza Amid
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-08-27

2.  Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis.

Authors:  Koudai Nagata; Kei Fuchigami; Ryoji Kitami; Yurie Okuhama; Kana Wakamori; Hirokazu Sumitomo; Hyunjin Kim; Manabu Okubo; Hiromasa Kawana
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of implants placed with osteotome sinus lift technique: 19-month follow-up.

Authors:  Bijan Movahedian Attar; Samaneh Alaei; Hamid Badrian; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

4.  Sinus Floor Elevation via an Osteotome Technique without Biomaterials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Andrés-García; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Pedro Bullón; Javier Fernández-Farhall; Alberto Gómez-Menchero; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Graftless crestal hydraulic sinus lift with simultaneous implant insertion.

Authors:  Varsha Sunil Manekar
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  A Pilot Investigation Generating an Alternative Therapeutic Strategy Combining Deproteinized Bovine Bone and Gelatin Sponge for a Novel Implant Material in Sinus Floor Elevation Operation.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Chang; Miao Wang; Liangzhi Du; Lifan Liao; Lixing He; Huixia Zhou; Longlong He
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-09-01

7.  Radiographic comparison of density and height of posterior maxillary bone after open sinus lift surgery with and without PRF.

Authors:  Mohamad Taghi Chitsazi; Ali Hosien Dehghani; Amir Reza Babaloo; Sohrab Amini; Hadi Kokabi
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2018-12-25

8.  Outcomes Following Hydraulic Pressure Indirect Sinus Lift in Cases of Simultaneous Implant Placement With Platelet-Rich Fibrin.

Authors:  Shivendra Choudhary; Yashika Bali; Amrit Kumar; Vaibhav Singh; Ravpreet Singh; Kamal Nayan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-16

9.  Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Sergio H L Martins; Uislen B Cadore; Arthur B Novaes; Michel R Messora; Bruna Ghiraldini; Fabio J B Bezerra; Daniele Botticelli; Sergio L S de Souza
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-08-21

10.  Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianqi Guo; Karan Gulati; Ziyun Shen; Pingping Han; Zhen Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.