Literature DB >> 11844417

A clinical and microbiological evaluation of denture cleansers for geriatric patients in long-term care institutions.

Mervin Gornitsky1, Isabelle ParadisI, German Landaverde, Anne-Marie Malo, Ana Miriam Velly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many elderly patients in long-term care hospitals cannot adequately brush their dentures because of disease, dementia and poor dexterity. Such inadequate cleaning may allow for the multiplication of Candida spp. and bacteria, which could serve as reservoirs for disseminating infections.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 3 denture cleansers in reducing the number of microorganisms on dentures in a hospitalized geriatric population.
METHODS: Three brands of cleanser (Denture Brite, Polident and Efferdent) were compared; water was used as the control. Microbiological samples were obtained before and after 3 one-week periods of cleanser use; these samples were taken by a microbiologist blinded to the assigned treatment. In the statistical analysis, the ranks of the differences between the before-treatment and after-treatment scores of each regimen were compared by means of the general linear model. In addition, the efficacy of each cleanser in reducing accumulation of plaque, stain and food was assessed.
RESULTS: The rank of the differences in the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of Candida spp. before and after one week of use of Denture Brite (p = 0.04) and Polident (p = 0.01), was significantly greater than that of the control group, but there was no difference between Efferdent use and control (p = 0.10). No significant differences in reduction of Streptococcus mutans were observed between Denture Brite (p = 0.13) or Polident (p = 0.12) and the control group, whereas dentures cleaned with Efferdent exhibited significantly greater reduction in Streptococcus mutans (p = 0.02) than dentures cleaned with water. Over all study periods, there were no significant differences among the cleansers in reduction of Candida spp. or Streptococcus mutans. Dentures cleaned with Denture Brite, Polident or Efferdent appeared to have similar reductions in the level of plaque, stain and food, and all had substantially greater reductions than dentures cleaned with water only. The significant difference in the rank of the reduction in Candida spp. CFUs (p = 0.005) was related to the variance between study periods (p = 0.01) and the variance between subjects (p = 0.008). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of denture cleansers significantly reduced the number of microorganisms on dentures in a hospitalized geriatric population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11844417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  24 in total

1.  The effect of disinfecting solutions on bending properties and weight changes of Co-Cr and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloys for dentures.

Authors:  Triantafillos Papadopoulos; Gregory Polyzois; Athena Tapanli; Maria Frangou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Toothbrush Handles Individually Adapted for Use by Elderly Patients to Reduce Biofilm on Complete Dentures: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Esteves Kammers; Artemio Luiz Zanetti; Tânia E Silva Pulicano Lacerda; Janaina Paula Aroca; Veridiana Camilotti; Marcio José Mendonça
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  Evaluation of awareness and knowledge about denture cleansers among dental professionals.

Authors:  Neeta Pasricha; Venus Sidana
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Clinical and antimicrobial efficacy of NitrAdine ™-based disinfecting cleaning tablets in complete denture wearers.

Authors:  Cláudia Helena Silva-Lovato; Bart de Wever; Els Adriaens; Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos; Evandro Watanabe; Maria Xavier Pisani; Rafael Freitas de Souza; Isabel Yoko Ito
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 5.  Infection prevention in long-term care: a systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized trials.

Authors:  Mayuko Uchida; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Philip W Smith; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Effects of a mouthwash with chlorine dioxide on oral malodor and salivary bacteria: a randomized placebo-controlled 7-day trial.

Authors:  Kayoko Shinada; Masayuki Ueno; Chisato Konishi; Sachiko Takehara; Sayaka Yokoyama; Takashi Zaitsu; Mari Ohnuki; Fredrick Allan Clive Wright; Yoko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Effect of Aloe vera, chlorine dioxide, and chlorhexidine mouth rinses on plaque and gingivitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sravan Kumar Yeturu; Shashidhar Acharya; Arun Sreenivas Urala; Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-09-11

8.  Comparative Evaluation of Effect of Water Absorption on the Surface Properties of Heat Cure Acrylic: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  G S Chandu; Pooja Asnani; Siddarth Gupta; Mohd Faisal Khan
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-04

9.  A randomized double blind crossover placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the effects of a mouthwash containing chlorine dioxide on oral malodor.

Authors:  Kayoko Shinada; Masayuki Ueno; Chisato Konishi; Sachiko Takehara; Sayaka Yokoyama; Yoko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners.

Authors:  Luciana Valadares Oliveira; Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita; Guilherme Elias Pessanha Henriques; Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani; Wagner Sotero Fragoso
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.