Literature DB >> 11843852

Diagnosis of metachronous contralateral breast cancer.

R S Samant1, I A Olivotto, J S Jackson, D Mates.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of primary breast cancers (PBCs) and metachronous contralateral breast cancers (MCBCs). Between 1984 and 1996, 236 women treated with curative intent for PBC who developed a MCBC >6 months after initial diagnosis (without previous evidence of distant metastases) were retrospectively evaluated for clinical and pathologic characteristics and method of diagnosis of their tumors. There were more noninvasive cancers among the MCBCs than the PBCs (11.4% and 5.1%, respectively, p < 0.02). Among the invasive cancers, the mean size of the MCBCs was smaller than the PBCs (1.94 versus 2.55 cm, p < 0.001). MCBCs were more likely than PBCs to be mammographically detected (46.2% versus 19.9%, p < 0.001). Tumor size was correlated with the method of diagnosis. The mean tumor size was 1.39, 2.02, and 2.69 cm for mammogram-, physician-, and patient-detected tumors, respectively. Among patients having axillary lymph node dissections, mammogram- and physician-detected tumors were less likely to have lymph node metastases than patient-detected tumors (22.0% versus 41.2%, p < 0.005). Regular follow-up of breast cancer patients diagnoses MCBCs when they are smaller and less likely to have nodal metastases than PBCs mainly because of early mammographic detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11843852     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.07605.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is symptom-oriented follow-up still up to date?

Authors:  Christoph Mundhenke; Volker Moebus
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancer in Older Women.

Authors:  Martha E Goodrich; Julie Weiss; Tracy Onega; Steve L Balch; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Under utilization of surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Terry S Field; Chyke Doubeni; Matthew P Fox; Diana S M Buist; Feifei Wei; Ann M Geiger; Virginia P Quinn; Timothy L Lash; Marianne N Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Floyd J Frost; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Breast-Conserving Surgery in Bilateral Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julie A O'Brien; Alice Ho; G Paul Wright; Michelle Stempel; Sujata Patil; Kate Krause; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Alternative methods of follow up in breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D A Montgomery; K Krupa; T G Cooke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Synchronous and metachronous breast malignancies: a cross-sectional retrospective study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Sergio Bernardi; Serena Bertozzi; Vito Angione; Giuliana Gentile; Cinzia Dri; Antonio Minucci; Filippo Caponnetto; Roberto Petri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Bilateral breast cancer in China: A 10-year single-center retrospective study (2006-2016).

Authors:  Hanfang Jiang; Ruyan Zhang; Xiaoran Liu; Ran Ran; Jiayang Zhang; Yaxin Liu; Xinyu Gui; Yifei Chen; Kun Li; Bin Shao; Ying Yan; Xu Liang; Guohong Song; Lijun Di; Huiping Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.