BACKGROUND: Annual surveillance mammography is recommended for follow-up of women with a history of breast cancer. We examined surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors who were enrolled in integrated healthcare systems. METHODS: Women in this study were 65 or older when diagnosed with early stage invasive breast cancer (N = 1,762). We assessed mammography use during 4 years of follow-up, using generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent had mammograms during the first year after treatment; the percentage declined to 68.5% in the fourth year of follow-up. Controlling for age and comorbidity, women who were at higher risk of recurrence by being diagnosed at stage II or receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) without radiation therapy were less likely to have yearly mammograms (compared to stage I, odds ratio [OR] for stage IIA 0.72, confidence interval [CI] 0.59, 0.87, OR for stage IIB 0.75, CI 0.57, 1.0; compared to BCS with radiation, OR 0.58, CI 0.43, 0.77). Women with visits to a breast cancer surgeon or oncologist were more likely to receive mammograms (OR for breast cancer surgeon 6.0, CI 4.9, 7.4, OR for oncologist 7.4, CI 6.1, 9.0). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors who are at greater risk of recurrence are less likely to receive surveillance mammograms. Women without a visit to an oncologist or breast cancer surgeon during a year have particularly low rates of mammography. Improvements to surveillance care for breast cancer survivors may require active participation by primary care physicians and improvements in cancer survivorship programs by healthcare systems.
BACKGROUND: Annual surveillance mammography is recommended for follow-up of women with a history of breast cancer. We examined surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors who were enrolled in integrated healthcare systems. METHODS:Women in this study were 65 or older when diagnosed with early stage invasive breast cancer (N = 1,762). We assessed mammography use during 4 years of follow-up, using generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent had mammograms during the first year after treatment; the percentage declined to 68.5% in the fourth year of follow-up. Controlling for age and comorbidity, women who were at higher risk of recurrence by being diagnosed at stage II or receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) without radiation therapy were less likely to have yearly mammograms (compared to stage I, odds ratio [OR] for stage IIA 0.72, confidence interval [CI] 0.59, 0.87, OR for stage IIB 0.75, CI 0.57, 1.0; compared to BCS with radiation, OR 0.58, CI 0.43, 0.77). Women with visits to a breast cancer surgeon or oncologist were more likely to receive mammograms (OR for breast cancer surgeon 6.0, CI 4.9, 7.4, OR for oncologist 7.4, CI 6.1, 9.0). CONCLUSIONS:Breast cancer survivors who are at greater risk of recurrence are less likely to receive surveillance mammograms. Women without a visit to an oncologist or breast cancer surgeon during a year have particularly low rates of mammography. Improvements to surveillance care for breast cancer survivors may require active participation by primary care physicians and improvements in cancer survivorship programs by healthcare systems.
Authors: Ann M Geiger; Soe Soe Thwin; Timothy L Lash; Diana S M Buist; Marianne N Prout; Feifei Wei; Terry S Field; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Floyd J Frost; Shelley M Enger; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shelley M Enger; Soe Soe Thwin; Diana S M Buist; Terry Field; Floyd Frost; Ann M Geiger; Timothy L Lash; Marianne Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James L Khatcheressian; Antonio C Wolff; Thomas J Smith; Eva Grunfeld; Hyman B Muss; Victor G Vogel; Francine Halberg; Mark R Somerfield; Nancy E Davidson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Benjamin D Smith; Cary P Gross; Grace L Smith; Deron H Galusha; Justin E Bekelman; Bruce G Haffty Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-05-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A C Voogd; G van Tienhoven; H L Peterse; M A Crommelin; E J Rutgers; C J van de Velde; B N van Geel; A Slot; P T Rodrigus; J J Jobsen; M F von Meyenfeldt; J W Coebergh Journal: Cancer Date: 1999-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Phyllis Brawarsky; Bridget A Neville; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Michael J Hassett; Jennifer S Haas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tenbroeck G Smith; Sara Strollo; Xin Hu; Craig C Earle; Corinne R Leach; Larissa Nekhlyudov Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Diana S M Buist; Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Heather Taffet Gold; Terry Field; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Virginia P Quinn; Marianne Prout; Timothy L Lash Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Heidi S Wirtz; Denise M Boudreau; Julie R Gralow; William E Barlow; Shelly Gray; Erin J A Bowles; Diana S M Buist Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Erica S Breslau; Diana D Jeffery; William W Davis; Richard P Moser; Timothy S McNeel; Sarah Hawley Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 4.442