Literature DB >> 11843421

Residential and commercial painters' exposure to lead during surface preparation.

Peter F Scholz1, Barbara L Materna, David Harrington, Connie Uratsu.   

Abstract

The California Painters Project was a 2-year intervention research project aimed at preventing lead poisoning among a group of residential and commercial painters in San Francisco, Calif. As part of this project 12 contractors invited project staff to conduct employee exposure monitoring. Twenty-five full-shift samples were collected, with 8-hr TWA results ranging from 0.8 to 550 microg/m3 (arithmetic mean: 57 microg/m3). Six of the 25 samples (24%) were above the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit; all of these involved dry manual sanding or uncontrolled power sanding. Fifty-eight 30-minute task-specific samples also were collected. The arithmetic mean concentration results for heat gun use, wet sanding, and open flame burning were all under 10 microg/m3; the mean concentration for HEPA-exhausted power sanding was 33 microg/m3; dry manual scraping, 71 microg/m3; dry manual sanding, 420 microg/m3; and uncontrolled power sanding, 580 microg/m3. Analysis and modeling based on the 30-min results for dry manual sanding and uncontrolled power sanding indicate that painters' full-shift exposures often exceed 500 microg/m3 and the OSHA assigned level of protection for a half-mask air-purifying respirator. These results are cause for concern because both of these surface preparation methods are widely performed wearing half-mask respirators. The data show that HEPA-exhausted power sanding reduces paint dust exposure levels by approximately 80 to 90%. These tools should be more widely promoted as a safer alternative work method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11843421     DOI: 10.1080/15428110208984687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)        ISSN: 1542-8117


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of dust released from sanding conventional and nanoparticle-doped wall and wood coatings.

Authors:  Ismo Kalevi Koponen; Keld Alstrup Jensen; Thomas Schneider
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 2.  A review and perspective of existing research on the release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites.

Authors:  Stephan J Froggett; Shaun F Clancy; Darrell R Boverhof; Richard A Canady
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 9.400

3.  Water-Based Automobile Paints Potentially Reduce the Exposure of Refinish Painters to Toxic Metals.

Authors:  Der-Jen Hsu; Shun-Hui Chung; Jie-Feng Dong; Hui-Chung Shih; Hong-Bin Chang; Yeh-Chung Chien
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Lung cancer risk in painters: results from the SYNERGY pooled case-control study consortium.

Authors:  Neela Guha; Liacine Bouaoun; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Thomas Brüning; Thomas Behrens; Susan Peters; Véronique Luzon; Jack Siemiatycki; Mengting Xu; Benjamin Kendzia; Pascal Guenel; Danièle Luce; Stefan Karrasch; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Dario Consonni; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil E Caporaso; Per Gustavsson; Nils Plato; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Richiardi; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Wolfgang Ahrens; Hermann Pohlabeln; Lap Ah Tse; Ignatius Tak-Sun Yu; Adonina Tardón; Paolo Boffetta; David Zaridze; Andrea 't Mannetje; Neil Pearce; Michael P A Davies; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Świątkowska; John McLaughlin; Paul A Demers; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Tamás Pándics; Eleonora Fabianova; Dana Mates; Francesco Forastiere; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Joachim Schüz; Kurt Straif; Ann Olsson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.