OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology, Version II (SNAP-II), improved prediction of severe (> or = grade III) intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and chronic lung disease (CLD) when compared to models using gestational age (GA) and traditional risk factors (e.g., Apgar score, small-for-gestational-age, sex, outborn status). STUDY DESIGN: We examined 4226 infants < or = 32 weeks' GA admitted to 17 Canadian neonatal intensive care units between 1996 and 1997. We compared prediction models for severe IVH and CLD, with and without SNAP-II. RESULTS: SNAP-II was a significant and independent predictor of severe IVH and CLD. Addition of SNAP-II to models using GA and traditional risk variables significantly (p<0.05) improved model prediction (AUC 0.8 for severe IVH; 0.83 for CLD). Models were well calibrated (p>0.05 for Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test). CONCLUSION: Addition of SNAP-II to models using GA and traditional risk factors significantly improves prediction of severe IVH and CLD.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology, Version II (SNAP-II), improved prediction of severe (> or = grade III) intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and chronic lung disease (CLD) when compared to models using gestational age (GA) and traditional risk factors (e.g., Apgar score, small-for-gestational-age, sex, outborn status). STUDY DESIGN: We examined 4226 infants < or = 32 weeks' GA admitted to 17 Canadian neonatal intensive care units between 1996 and 1997. We compared prediction models for severe IVH and CLD, with and without SNAP-II. RESULTS: SNAP-II was a significant and independent predictor of severe IVH and CLD. Addition of SNAP-II to models using GA and traditional risk variables significantly (p<0.05) improved model prediction (AUC 0.8 for severe IVH; 0.83 for CLD). Models were well calibrated (p>0.05 for Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test). CONCLUSION: Addition of SNAP-II to models using GA and traditional risk factors significantly improves prediction of severe IVH and CLD.
Authors: Shoo K Lee; Khalid Aziz; Nalini Singhal; Catherine M Cronin; Andrew James; David S C Lee; Derek Matthew; Arne Ohlsson; Koravangattu Sankaran; Mary Seshia; Anne Synnes; Robin Walker; Robin Whyte; Joanne Langley; Ying C MacNab; Bonnie Stevens; Peter von Dadelszen Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jill G Zwicker; Ruth E Grunau; Elysia Adams; Vann Chau; Rollin Brant; Kenneth J Poskitt; Anne Synnes; Steven P Miller Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Brynne A Sullivan; Christina McClure; Jamie Hicks; Douglas E Lake; J Randall Moorman; Karen D Fairchild Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Wes Onland; Thomas P Debray; Matthew M Laughon; Martijn Miedema; Filip Cools; Lisa M Askie; Jeanette M Asselin; Sandra A Calvert; Sherry E Courtney; Carlo Dani; David J Durand; Neil Marlow; Janet L Peacock; J Jane Pillow; Roger F Soll; Ulrich H Thome; Patrick Truffert; Michael D Schreiber; Patrick Van Reempts; Valentina Vendettuoli; Giovanni Vento; Anton H van Kaam; Karel G Moons; Martin Offringa Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: J W Logan; O Dammann; E N Allred; C Dammann; K Beam; R M Joseph; T M O'Shea; A Leviton; K C K Kuban Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Jonathan L Slaughter; Clifford L Cua; Jennifer L Notestine; Brian K Rivera; Laura Marzec; Erinn M Hade; Nathalie L Maitre; Mark A Klebanoff; Megan Ilgenfritz; Vi T Le; Dennis J Lewandowski; Carl H Backes Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.125