STUDY DESIGN: Transverse pelvis and thorax rotations were studied during walking in 39 patients with nonspecific low back pain and 19 healthy participants. OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into the consequences of low back pain for gait and to identify clinically useful measures for characterizing the quality of walking in patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gait studies in patients with low back pain have reported a decrease in walking velocity. In normal gait, in-phase pelvis-thorax coordination (synchronicity) evolves toward antiphase coordination (counterrotation) as walking velocity increases. This study examined the effect of walking velocity on pelvis and thorax rotations in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Amplitudes of pelvis and thorax rotations were calculated, and spectral analyses were performed. Pelvis-thorax coordination was characterized in terms of relative Fourier phase, and coupling strength was assessed by means of cross-spectral analysis. RESULTS: In comparison with healthy participants, relative Fourier phase was significantly smaller in low back pain patients for walking velocities of 3.8 km/h and higher, whereas coupling strength was significantly higher for velocities from 1.4 to 3.0 km/h. No significant group differences were found in amplitude or spectral content of individual pelvis and thorax rotations. CONCLUSION: In comparison with healthy participants, the gait of patients with low back pain was characterized by a more rigid, less flexible pelvis-thorax coordination in the absence of significant differences in the kinematics of the component rotations. This result suggests that coordination measures are more adequate in assessing quality of walking in patients with low back pain than are kinematic measures pertaining to the individual segment rotations, and that conservative therapy should use methods aimed at improving intersegmental coordination.
STUDY DESIGN: Transverse pelvis and thorax rotations were studied during walking in 39 patients with nonspecific low back pain and 19 healthy participants. OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into the consequences of low back pain for gait and to identify clinically useful measures for characterizing the quality of walking in patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gait studies in patients with low back pain have reported a decrease in walking velocity. In normal gait, in-phase pelvis-thorax coordination (synchronicity) evolves toward antiphase coordination (counterrotation) as walking velocity increases. This study examined the effect of walking velocity on pelvis and thorax rotations in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Amplitudes of pelvis and thorax rotations were calculated, and spectral analyses were performed. Pelvis-thorax coordination was characterized in terms of relative Fourier phase, and coupling strength was assessed by means of cross-spectral analysis. RESULTS: In comparison with healthy participants, relative Fourier phase was significantly smaller in low back painpatients for walking velocities of 3.8 km/h and higher, whereas coupling strength was significantly higher for velocities from 1.4 to 3.0 km/h. No significant group differences were found in amplitude or spectral content of individual pelvis and thorax rotations. CONCLUSION: In comparison with healthy participants, the gait of patients with low back pain was characterized by a more rigid, less flexible pelvis-thorax coordination in the absence of significant differences in the kinematics of the component rotations. This result suggests that coordination measures are more adequate in assessing quality of walking in patients with low back pain than are kinematic measures pertaining to the individual segment rotations, and that conservative therapy should use methods aimed at improving intersegmental coordination.
Authors: Maarten R Prins; Mariëtte Griffioen; Thom T J Veeger; Henri Kiers; Onno G Meijer; Peter van der Wurff; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jaap H van Dieën Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Claudine J C Lamoth; Onno G Meijer; Andreas Daffertshofer; Paul I J M Wuisman; Peter J Beek Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-04-29 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: W H Wu; O G Meijer; K Uegaki; J M A Mens; J H van Dieën; P I J M Wuisman; H C Ostgaard Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2004-08-27 Impact factor: 3.134