Literature DB >> 11839997

Why don't we ask patients with coronary heart disease directly how much they have changed after treatment?

Berrie Middel1, Mathieu de Greef, Mike J L de Jongste, Harry J G M Crijns, Roy Stewart, Wim J A van den Heuvel.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 11839997     DOI： 10.1097/00008483-200201000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil        ISSN： 0883-9212            Impact factor:   2.081


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research.

Authors:  Berrie Middel; Eric van Sonderen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 5.120

2.  Patient-reported questionnaires in MS rehabilitation: responsiveness and minimal important difference of the multiple sclerosis questionnaire for physiotherapists (MSQPT).

Authors:  Nico Arie van der Maas
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  Is retrospective assessment of health-related quality of life valid?

Authors:  Andrew Lawson; Aidan C Tan; Justine Naylor; Ian A Harris
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention-postintervention design.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Caroline Lornudd; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Robert Lundmark; Rebecca Mosson; Ulrika Eskner Skoger; Tatja Hirvikoski; Henna Hasson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Agreement between pre-post measures of change and transition ratings as well as then-tests.

Authors:  Thorsten Meyer; Susanne Richter; Heiner Raspe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.615
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.