Literature DB >> 11837838

Patterns of loosening of the glenoid component.

J Nagels1, E R Valstar, M Stokdijk, P M Rozing.   

Abstract

The incidence of loosening of a cemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty, detected by means of radiolucent lines or positional shift of the component on true anteroposterior radiographs, has been reported to be between 0% and 44%. Radiolucent lines are, however, difficult to detect and to interpret because of the mobility of the shoulder girdle and the obliquity of the glenoid which hinder standardisation of radiographs. We examined radiolucencies around cemented glenoid components in 48 patients, with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, and found progressive changes to be present predominantly at the inferior pole of the component. This may hold a clue for the mechanism of loosening of this implant. In five patients we performed an additional analysis of loosening of the glenoid component using digital roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). After three years, three of the five implants had loosened (migration 1.2 to 5.5 mm). In only one, with gross loosening, were the radiological signs consistent with the RSA findings. When traditional radiographs are used for assessment, the rate of early loosening is underestimated. We recommend that RSA be used for this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11837838     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.11951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in cemented shoulder hemi-arthroplasties: study of concordance and reproducibility.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Santos Martínez-Díaz; Aina Ruiz; Alberto Gines; Enrique Cáceres
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty in advanced collapse of the humeral head.

Authors:  R Hudek; B Werner; A F Abdelkawi; F Gohlke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Long-term survival of the glenoid components in total shoulder replacement for arthritis.

Authors:  Dominique F Gazielly; Marius M Scarlat; Olivier Verborgt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Management of complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hithem Rahmi; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

5.  Radiostereometric analysis of keeled versus pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized feasibility study.

Authors:  Trevor C Gascoyne; Sheila M B McRae; Sara L Parashin; Jeff R S Leiter; Martin J Petrak; Eric R Bohm; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  In vitro comparison of wear characteristics of PyroCarbon and metal on bone: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerome J Klawitter; Jason Patton; Robert More; Noel Peter; Evgeny Podnos; Mark Ross
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Wear performance of inverted non-conforming bearings in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Banci; Alessio Meoli; Martin Hintner; Hans Rudolf Bloch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-02-07

9.  Prognostic factors in arthroplasty in the rheumatoid shoulder.

Authors:  Piet M Rozing; Jochem Nagels; Maarten P Rozing
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-07-14

10.  Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant.

Authors:  Junaid Sarah; Gupta Sanjay; Sanghavi Sanjay; Anglin Carolyn; Roger Emery; Amis Andrew; Hansen Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.