Literature DB >> 11837555

Economic impact of asthma therapy with fluticasone propionate, montelukast, or zafirlukast in a managed care population.

Dev S Pathak1, E Anne Davis, Richard H Stanford.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare asthma-related health care expenditures among patients newly prescribed fluticasone propionate 44 or 110 microg, montelukast 5 or 10 mg, or zafirlukast 20 mg.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of medical and pharmacy claims.
SETTING: University-affiliated health outcomes research center. PATIENTS: Seven hundred eighty-one patients (aged > or = 4 yrs) with asthma treated with controller therapy for 9 months (postindex period), with no claim for an inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene modifier in the previous 9 months (preindex period). INTERVENTION: Asthma-related medical and pharmacy data from insurance claims of four managed care plans (two Northeastern, one Midwestern, and one Western) were tabulated over the pre- and postindex periods.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Numbers of patients identified were 284 beginning fluticasone propionate; 302, montelukast; and 195, zafirlukast. Fluticasone propionate treatment was associated with significantly (p<0.001) lower risk-adjusted asthma-related charges compared with montelukast and zafirlukast treatment: $528, $967, and $1359, respectively In this cohort, fluticasone propionate also was associated with fewer hospitalizations, less need for additional controller agents, and longer maintenance on the index drug compared with montelukast and zafirlukast.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these real-world data, as well as established national and international asthma guidelines, consideration should be given to inhaled corticosteroid therapy, particularly fluticasone propionate, for first-line, long-term effective management of asthma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11837555     DOI: 10.1592/phco.22.3.166.33548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the use of retrospective databases in conducting economic evaluations of drugs: the case of asthma.

Authors:  Fredrik Berggren
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of leukotriene modifiers in adults with asthma.

Authors:  Pamela C Heaton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of fluticasone versus montelukast in children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in the Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial.

Authors:  Li Wang; Christopher S Hollenbeak; David T Mauger; Robert S Zeiger; Ian M Paul; Christine A Sorkness; Robert F Lemanske; Fernando D Martinez; Robert C Strunk; Stanley J Szefler; Lynn M Taussig
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Impact of asthma controller medications on clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Hiangkiat Tan; Chaitanya Sarawate; Joseph Singer; Kurt Elward; Rubin I Cohen; Brian A Smart; Michael F Busk; James Lustig; Jeana D O'Brien; Michael Schatz
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line controller therapies for persistent asthma.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Josephine Mauskopf; Rohit Borker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Treatment options for initial maintenance therapy of persistent asthma: a review of inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Peter S Creticos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Clinical and economic outcomes associated with low-dose fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in children with asthma aged 4 to 11 years.

Authors:  Richard H Stanford; Manan Shah; Sham L Chaudhari
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2012-06-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.