Literature DB >> 16898844

Cost effectiveness of leukotriene modifiers in adults with asthma.

Pamela C Heaton1.   

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic disorder in industrialised nations, with over 100 million people worldwide affected. Leukotrienes are chemical mediators released from mast cells, eosinophils and basophils. They cause bronchoconstriction, an increase in mucous secretions and activation of inflammatory cells. Leukotriene modifiers are a long-term controller medication used to treat asthma. They function by selectively competing for the leukotriene receptor sites, thereby blocking their action, or by inhibiting 5-lipoxygenase and thus preventing leukotriene formation. Both current US and Global Initiative for Asthma treatment guidelines have clarified the role of leukotriene modifiers in the management of asthma in adults and children. Leukotriene modifiers have two distinct roles: to replace inhaled corticosteroids in milder asthma and as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in more severe asthma. While efficacy is certainly an important issue, economic considerations are also important in a disease such as asthma where there are a variety of treatment options and the severity of the disease varies widely. This review examined published studies to better understand the cost effectiveness of leukotriene modifiers in adults with asthma. Fifteen articles were found that analysed the cost effectiveness of leukotriene modifiers, with almost all performed in the US. The vast majority of the studies were retrospective claims analyses, but three randomised controlled trials incorporating economic outcomes have been reported. The majority of the articles found that for both monotherapy in mild persistent asthma and add-on therapy in moderate persistent asthma, leukotriene modifiers were less cost effective than inhaled corticosteroids with or without a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist. However, these results must be viewed cautiously as in several studies there were methodological issues such as comparisons of unequal treatment groups or inappropriate use of leukotriene modifiers in stepwise treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16898844     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624080-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  52 in total

1.  Pharmacoeconomic studies of asthma controller drugs: marketing gimmick or icing on the cake?

Authors:  Leslie Hendeles; Richard Segal
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Asthma guidelines: an assessment of physician understanding and practice.

Authors:  K C Doerschug; M W Peterson; C S Dayton; J N Kline
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups.

Authors:  G Pappas; W C Hadden; L J Kozak; G F Fisher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cost-effectiveness comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in the treatment of adults with persistent asthma.

Authors:  Ketan Sheth; Rohit Borker; Amanda Emmett; Kathleen Rickard; Paul Dorinsky
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Asthma outcome changes associated with use of the leukotriene-receptor antagonist zafirlukast.

Authors:  D Klingman; L Bielory; Y Wang; S Silverman; C F Bell; K A Joy; M T Dever; D A Jones
Journal:  Manag Care Interface       Date:  2001-02

Review 6.  The health economics of asthma and rhinitis. I. Assessing the economic impact.

Authors:  K B Weiss; S D Sullivan
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Salmeterol powder provides significantly better benefit than montelukast in asthmatic patients receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Authors:  J E Fish; E Israel; J J Murray; A Emmett; R Boone; S W Yancey; K A Rickard
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Effect of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in a single device, fluticasone propionate, and montelukast on overall asthma control, exacerbations, and costs.

Authors:  Richard D O'Connor; Richard Stanford; Courtney Crim; Steven W Yancey; Lisa Edwards; Kathleen A Rickard; Paul Dorinsky
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 9.  Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma.

Authors:  F Ducharme; Z Schwartz; G Hicks; R Kakuma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

10.  Zafirlukast improves asthma symptoms and quality of life in patients with moderate reversible airflow obstruction.

Authors:  R A Nathan; J A Bernstein; L Bielory; C M Bonuccelli; W J Calhoun; S P Galant; L A Hanby; J P Kemp; J W Kylstra; A S Nayak; J P O'Connor; H J Schwartz; D L Southern; S L Spector; P V Williams
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus inhaled corticosteroids for initial asthma controller therapy: a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Edward C F Wilson; Erika J Sims; Stanley D Musgrave; Lee Shepstone; Annie Blyth; Jamie Murdoch; H Miranda Mugford; Elizabeth F Juniper; Jon G Ayres; Stephanie Wolfe; Daryl Freeman; Richard F T Gilbert; Ian Harvey; Elizabeth V Hillyer; David Price
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.