Literature DB >> 11835482

Assessment of the CASP4 fold recognition category.

M J Sippl1, P Lackner, F S Domingues, A Prlić, R Malik, A Andreeva, M Wiederstein.   

Abstract

We present the assessment of the CASP4 fold recognition category. The tasks we had to execute include the splitting of multidomain targets into single domains, the classification of target domains in terms of prediction categories, the numerical evaluation of predictions, the mapping of numerical scores to quality indices, the ranking of predictors, the selection of top-performing groups, and the analysis and critical discussion of the state of the art in this field. The 125 fold recognition groups were assessed by a total score that summarizes their performance over all targets and a quality score reflecting the average quality of the submitted models. Most of the top-performing groups achieved respectable results on both scores simultaneously. Several groups submitted models that were much closer to the respective target structures than any of the known folds in the Protein Data Bank. The CASP4 assessment included the automated servers of the parallel CAFASP experiment. For the total score, the highest rank achieved by a fully automated server is 12. Two thirds of the predictors have rather low scores. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11835482     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  16 in total

1.  Can correct protein models be identified?

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Detection of homologous proteins by an intermediate sequence search.

Authors:  Bino John; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone.

Authors:  Lukasz Jaroszewski; Weizhong Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Conservation of structure and function among tyrosine recombinases: homology-based modeling of the lambda integrase core-binding domain.

Authors:  Brian M Swalla; Richard I Gumport; Jeffrey F Gardner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  GeneSilico protein structure prediction meta-server.

Authors:  Michal A Kurowski; Janusz M Bujnicki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Exploring the sequence-structure protein landscape in the glycosyltransferase family.

Authors:  Ziding Zhang; Sunil Kochhar; Martin Grigorov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-02-01

8.  Descriptor-based protein remote homology identification.

Authors:  Ziding Zhang; Sunil Kochhar; Martin G Grigorov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Computational study of the heterodimerization between mu and delta receptors.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Ming Kai; Lian Jin; Rui Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14).

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; R Dustin Schaeffer; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.