Literature DB >> 34350630

Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14).

Lisa N Kinch1, R Dustin Schaeffer2, Andriy Kryshtafovych3, Nick V Grishin1,2,4.   

Abstract

An evolutionary-based definition and classification of target evaluation units (EUs) is presented for the 14th round of the critical assessment of structure prediction (CASP14). CASP14 targets included 84 experimental models submitted by various structural groups (designated T1024-T1101). Targets were split into EUs based on the domain organization of available templates and performance of server groups. Several targets required splitting (19 out of 25 multidomain targets) due in part to observed conformation changes. All in all, 96 CASP14 EUs were defined and assigned to tertiary structure assessment categories (Topology-based FM or High Accuracy-based TBM-easy and TBM-hard) considering their evolutionary relationship to existing ECOD fold space: 24 family level, 50 distant homologs (H-group), 12 analogs (X-group), and 10 new folds. Principal component analysis and heatmap visualization of sequence and structure similarity to known templates as well as performance of servers highlighted trends in CASP14 target difficulty. The assigned evolutionary levels (i.e., H-groups) and assessment classes (i.e., FM) displayed overlapping clusters of EUs. Many viral targets diverged considerably from their template homologs and thus were more difficult for prediction than other homology-related targets. On the other hand, some targets did not have sequence-identifiable templates, but were predicted better than expected due to relatively simple arrangements of secondary structural elements. An apparent improvement in overall server performance in CASP14 further complicated traditional classification, which ultimately assigned EUs into high-accuracy modeling (27 TBM-easy and 31 TBM-hard), topology (23 FM), or both (15 FM/TBM).
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP14; evolutionary structure classification; fold space; free modeling; high-accuracy modeling evaluation; protein domains; protein structure; sequence homologs; structure analogs; structure prediction; template-based modeling; topology evaluation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34350630      PMCID: PMC8616802          DOI: 10.1002/prot.26202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  49 in total

1.  Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets.

Authors:  A G Murzin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  Partitioning protein structures into domains: why is it so difficult?

Authors:  Timothy A Holland; Stella Veretnik; Ilya N Shindyalov; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  DDOMAIN: Dividing structures into domains using a normalized domain-domain interaction profile.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Bin Xue; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein Sequence Analysis Using the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit.

Authors:  Felix Gabler; Seung-Zin Nam; Sebastian Till; Milot Mirdita; Martin Steinegger; Johannes Söding; Andrei N Lupas; Vikram Alva
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12

5.  Searching ECOD for Homologous Domains by Sequence and Structure.

Authors:  R Dustin Schaeffer; Yuxing Liao; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03

6.  CASP 11 target classification.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Wenlin Li; R Dustin Schaeffer; Roland L Dunbrack; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-01-27

7.  A Web-Based Protocol for Interprotein Contact Prediction by Deep Learning.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Hong Zeng; Sheng Wang; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

8.  CASP13 target classification into tertiary structure prediction categories.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-07-24

9.  Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Jie Hou; Tianqi Wu; Renzhi Cao; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-04-25

10.  A database of domain definitions for proteins with complex interdomain geometry.

Authors:  Indraneel Majumdar; Lisa N Kinch; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-10-07

2.  Multi-state modeling of G-protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Cryo-EM targets in CASP14.

Authors:  Tristan Cragnolini; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Maya Topf
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  Enhancing Microbiome Research through Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling.

Authors:  Nana Y D Ankrah; David B Bernstein; Matthew Biggs; Maureen Carey; Melinda Engevik; Beatriz García-Jiménez; Meiyappan Lakshmanan; Alan R Pacheco; Snorre Sulheim; Gregory L Medlock
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.496

5.  Assessing the utility of CASP14 models for molecular replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Millán; Ronan M Keegan; Joana Pereira; Massimo D Sammito; Adam J Simpkin; Airlie J McCoy; Andrei N Lupas; Marcus D Hartmann; Daniel J Rigden; Randy J Read
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-08-21

6.  A-Prot: protein structure modeling using MSA transformer.

Authors:  Yiyu Hong; Juyong Lee; Junsu Ko
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Co-component signal transduction systems: Fast-evolving virulence regulation cassettes discovered in enteric bacteria.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Qian Cong; Jananee Jaishankar; Kim Orth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Training undergraduate research assistants with an outcome-oriented and skill-based mentoring strategy.

Authors:  Dennis Della Corte; Connor J Morris; Wendy M Billings; Jacob Stern; Austin J Jarrett; Bryce Hedelius; Adam Bennion
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.699

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.