Literature DB >> 11835423

Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength measurement in elderly incontinent women.

K Kerschan-Schindl1, E Uher, G Wiesinger, A Kaider, G Ebenbichler, P Nicolakis, J Kollmitzer, E Preisinger, V Fialka-Moser.   

Abstract

Pelvic floor muscles (PFM) play an important role in maintaining urinary continence with increasing age. Therefore, their contractile properties need to be evaluated. The aim of the study was to examine the reliability and correlation of simple techniques to measure PFM strength in elderly women with urinary incontinence. An interview was used to evaluate the ability to stop the urinary stream during micturition and to calculate the incontinence index. A pad test was applied to objectively evaluate the severity of the disease. Functional testing included a digital examination to measure the force and duration of one contraction, a perineometer measurement (Peritron) to assess maximal contraction force and contraction force of 5 s, and a cone-retention test (Femcon) while walking for 1 min and during Valsalva's manoeuvre. This procedure was performed on three separate occasions within one week. The 37 participating women with a mean age of 62+/-8 (mean+/-SD) years had a severity index of 4.4+/-2.6 and a urine loss of 9.5+/-13.6 mg during the pad test. Sixteen women were able to completely stop the urinary stream during micturition. The digital examination showed no intratester variability. The perineometer measurement showed that the absolute difference in maximal contraction force and mean contraction force within 5 s was less than 5.3 mm Hg and 4.5 mm Hg, respectively, with a probability of 0.95. While walking and during Valsalva's manoeuvre, 19 and 20 women, respectively, held the same cone in place on all three occasions. The maximal contraction force and mean force during the 5-s contraction correlated well with the ability to stop the urinary stream and the digital examination but only weakly with the cone-retention tests. The reliability of PFM strength measurement is highest in the digital examination, followed by perineometer measurements, and then by vaginal cone tests. As PFM function is easy to assess, it should be routinely done in the assessment of urinary incontinence in elderly women. Copyright 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11835423     DOI: 10.1002/nau.2099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  12 in total

1.  [Female geriatric patients with urinary incontinence symptoms and their control over pelvic floor muscles].

Authors:  H Talasz; M Gosch; H Enzelsberger; H P Rhomberg
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Relationship between pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maíra de Menezes Franco; Patricia Driusso; Kari Bø; Daniela Cristina Carvalho de Abreu; Lucia Alves da Silva Lara; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa E Silva; Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Parity: a risk factor for decreased pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Ji Young Hwang; Bo-In Kim; Seung Hun Song
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests.

Authors:  Hogne Sandvik; Montserrat Espuna; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-03-18

5.  Initial experience with a new method for the dynamic assessment of pelvic floor function in women: the Kolpexin Pull Test.

Authors:  Nathan Guerette; Minda Neimark; Stacy L Kopka; Jacob E Jones; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-01-09

Review 6.  The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kobra Falah-Hassani; Joanna Reeves; Rahman Shiri; Duane Hickling; Linda McLean
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.932

7.  Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women.

Authors:  Dulcegleika V B Sartori; Monica O Gameiro; Hamilto A Yamamoto; Paulo R Kawano; Rodrigo Guerra; Carlos R Padovani; João L Amaro
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Relationship among vaginal palpation, vaginal squeeze pressure, electromyographic and ultrasonographic variables of female pelvic floor muscles.

Authors:  Vanessa S Pereira; Humberto S Hirakawa; Ana B Oliveira; Patricia Driusso
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women.

Authors:  Priscylla Helouyse Angelo; Larissa Ramalho Dantas Varella; Maria Clara Eugênia de Oliveira; Monayane Grazielly Leite Matias; Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Azevedo; Luzinete Medeiros de Almeida; Paulo Roberto Medeiros de Azevedo; Maria Thereza Micussi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison between measurements obtained with three different perineometers.

Authors:  Patrícia Brentegani Barbosa; Maíra Menezes Franco; Flaviane de Oliveira Souza; Flávia Ignácio Antônio; Thaís Montezuma; Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.